看例子:

开两个终端来对比:

在终端A:

[pgsql@localhost bin]$ ./psql
psql (9.1.)
Type "help" for help. pgsql=# begin;
BEGIN
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=# insert into tab01 values(,'');
INSERT
pgsql=# insert into tab01 values(,'');
INSERT
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=#

此时的终端B:

[pgsql@localhost bin]$ ./psql
psql (9.1.)
Type "help" for help. pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax, * from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=#

然后再在终端A进行提交:

pgsql=# commit;
COMMIT
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=#

此时,再在终端B进行观察:

pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax, * from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=#

继续研究cmin是咋回事:

pgsql=# begin;
BEGIN
pgsql=# insert into tab01(id,cd) values(generate_series(,),'xx');
INSERT
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+-----------+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | xx
| | | | | xx
( rows) pgsql=#

可以说cmin可理解为一个事务里,执行了几次sql命令的顺序。

那么cmax呢?在前面的基础上继续执行,居然没有看到区别:

pgsql=# update tab01 set id= where cd = '';
UPDATE
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+----+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | xx
| | | | | xx
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=# commit;
COMMIT
pgsql=# select xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax,* from tab01;
xmin | xmax | cmin | cmax | id | cd
------+------+------+------+----+----
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | xx
| | | | | xx
| | | | |
( rows) pgsql=#

经过反复折腾,终于发现,其实 cmin和 cmax就是一个东西:

看源代码:

/* ----------------
* heap_getsysattr
*
* Fetch the value of a system attribute for a tuple.
*
* This is a support routine for the heap_getattr macro. The macro
* has already determined that the attnum refers to a system attribute.
* ----------------
*/
Datum
heap_getsysattr(HeapTuple tup, int attnum, TupleDesc tupleDesc, bool *isnull)
{
Datum result; Assert(tup); /* Currently, no sys attribute ever reads as NULL. */
*isnull = false; switch (attnum)
{
case SelfItemPointerAttributeNumber:
/* pass-by-reference datatype */
result = PointerGetDatum(&(tup->t_self));
break;
case ObjectIdAttributeNumber:
result = ObjectIdGetDatum(HeapTupleGetOid(tup));
break;
case MinTransactionIdAttributeNumber:
result = TransactionIdGetDatum(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tup->t_data));
break;
case MaxTransactionIdAttributeNumber:
result = TransactionIdGetDatum(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(tup->t_data));
break;
case MinCommandIdAttributeNumber:
case MaxCommandIdAttributeNumber: /*
* cmin and cmax are now both aliases for the same field, which
* can in fact also be a combo command id. XXX perhaps we should
* return the "real" cmin or cmax if possible, that is if we are
* inside the originating transaction?
*/

result = CommandIdGetDatum(HeapTupleHeaderGetRawCommandId(tup->t_data));
break;
case TableOidAttributeNumber:
result = ObjectIdGetDatum(tup->t_tableOid);
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "invalid attnum: %d", attnum);
result = ; /* keep compiler quiet */
break;
}
return result;
}
04-28 00:29