内存参数设置不合理导致数据库HANG 现象: 2节点RAC,数据库忽然HANG住,重启一个实例后恢复正常。 分析: 故障时间段约为8:30-10:00,以下为alert报错: alert_crm2.log: Mon May 27 06:54:26 2013 SUCCESS:>Mon May 27 07:32:24 2013 Thread 2>ORA-07445:

内存参数设置不合理导致数据库HANG
现象:
2节点RAC,数据库忽然HANG住,重启一个实例后恢复正常。

分析:
故障时间段约为8:30-10:00,以下为alert报错:
alert_crm2.log:

Mon May 27 06:54:26 2013
SUCCESS:>Mon May 27 07:32:24 2013
Thread 2>ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kksMapCursor()+323] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x8] [PC:0x763597B] [Address not mapped to object] []
ORA-03135: 连接失去联系
Mon May 27 09:54:56 2013
Errors>ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kksMapCursor()+323] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x8] [PC:0x763597B] [Address not mapped to object] []
ORA-03135: 连接失去联系
Mon May 27 09:54:56 2013
Errors>ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kksMapCursor()+323] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x8] [PC:0x763597B] [Address not mapped to object] []
ORA-03135: 连接失去联系
Mon May 27 09:54:56 2013
Errors>ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kksMapCursor()+323] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x8] [PC:0x763597B] [Address not mapped to object] []
ORA-03135: 连接失去联系
Incident>USER (ospid: 15258): terminating the instance
Mon May 27 09:55:05 2013
ORA-1092 :>ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [723], [109464], [127072], [memory leak], [], [], [], [] Incident>loadavg : 69.72 40.04 27.44
memory>swap info: free = 0.00M alloc = 0.00M total = 0.00M
F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD
0 S>#0 0x0000003e2d6d50e7 in semop () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x000000000778a4f6>#7 0x0000000003b87b4a in kjdrchkdrm ()
#8 0x0000000003a38c5a>
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
--------- ------------------- -------- ---------
Begin Snap: 6261 27-May-13 09:00:40 404 7.5
End Snap: 6262 27-May-13 10:00:34 488 5.3
Elapsed: 59.90 (mins)
DB Time: 10,417.13 (mins)

Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms)>gc current block 2-way 411,847 673 2 3.8 Cluster
gc>
*** 2013-05-27 07:26:41.101
Trace>(session) sid: 1645 ser: 1 trans: (nil), creator: 0x590fc76e0
flags: (0x51) USR/->Dumping Session Wait History:
0:> wait_id=348204630 seq_num=17176 snap_id=1
wait> wait times (usecs) - max=infinite
wait> occurred after 228 microseconds of elapsed time
1:>




CRMM01_130527_0800.nmon.xlsx:

CPU Total CRMM01 User% Sys% Wait% Idle% CPU% CPUs

9:38:00 2.4 0.8 6.2 90.7 3.2 24
9:39:31 1.3 1 5.9 91.9 2.3 24
9:41:01 16 5 7.6 71.4 21 24
9:42:33 91.3 7.9 0.2 0.6 99.2 24 Time PID %CPU %Usr %Sys Size ResSet ResText ResData ShdLib MinorFault MajorFault Command
8:07:34 773 0.76 0 0.76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>8:07:34 774 36.91 0 36.91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 kswapd1 1.54 0

Memory MB CRMM01>
Paging>Node1: swap increased after 8:00.

CRMM01_130527_0800.nmon.xlsx:
Paging>8:03:03 589 10.81 kswapd0
8:06:03 589 1.68>
通过以上的日志分析,大致发现客户的DB在故障时间段存在一些问题:
1.内存资源紧张(a.lmd0在进行一些内存释放的操作;b.free>2.空闲SWAP页面紧张,大量的page in/out 3.严重的shared>4.实例1的lmd0在9:42-9:44HANG住(STALL),
还未完全理清的时候,客户的DB又出现了HANG住的情况,这次客户做了systemstate>HANG ANALYSIS:
instances (db_name.oracle_sid):>
Chains> Chain 1 Signature Hash: 0xb52ba8a9
[b] Chain 2 Signature: 'latch:> Chain 2 Signature Hash: 0x985d217a
[c] Chain 3 Signature: 'latch:> Chain 3 Signature Hash: 0xb52ba8a9

Chain 1:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle> p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
time> short stack: wait> time waited: 4.944027 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
2.> time waited: 0.104395 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
3.> time waited: 0.079024 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
}
and> {
instance: 1 (crm.crm1)
os> p2: 'number'=0x115
p3: 'tries'=0x0
time> current sql:
short> time waited: 5.627769 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
2.> time waited: 0.465190 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
3.> time waited: 0.082002 secs p2: 'number'=0x101
p3: 'tries'=0x0
}
从DUMP信息看来,这次的情况跟上次类似,大量的latch: shared pool等待。
客户的DB配置情况:
物理内存24G,而MEMORY_TARGET设置为22G,感觉配置的非常不合理,客户的情况跟我之前处理过的一个CASE很像(ORA-609:疑似MEMORY_TARGET设置过大导致的宕机http://blog.csdn.net/zhou1862324/article/details/17288103),都是MEMORY_TARGET参数设置过大导致出现SWAP PAGE IN/OUT的情况,最终导致数据库HANG住或宕机。
之前的CASE发生在另一位客户的一套非常重要的生产库上,数据库屡次宕机客户苦不堪言,而客户接收了我的建议将MEMORY_TARGET调低到一个合理的值之后,类似的问题没有再发生了。
所以,对于这个案例,我给了客户2个建议:
1.减少 memory_target 和 memory_max_target,预留更多内存供OS使用,减少发生SWAP PAGE IN/OUT的可能性。
2.启用hugepages,hugepages本身就是锁定在内存中不能被SWAP的,但Hugepages与memory_target不兼容,所以需要禁用memory_target,设置sga_target和pga_aggregate_target。
关于HUGEPAGE,可以参考我转的一篇文章HugePages on Oracle Linux 64-bit(http://blog.csdn.net/zhou1862324/article/details/17540277)。

解决方法:
最终客户选择了调小memory_target 和 memory_max_target,问题未再出现。

09-05 07:04