问题描述
有没有一个标准，当涉及到实施的键盘快捷键/快捷键的Web应用程序。
实施例：通过项目的列表导航$在网格psented p $
是他们对如何实现这一方针？
谷歌有实验室一节中一台用于Gmail。
Is there a standard when it comes to implementing keyboard shortcuts / accelerator keys for web applications. Example: Navigating through a list of items presented in a gridAre their guidelines on how to implement this?Google has one for GMail in the "labs" section.
也将其商业意义的投资，何时落实键盘快捷键/网络应用程序的快捷键
Also would it make business sense in investing time for implementing keyboard shortcuts / accelerator keys in web apps
推荐答案
我已经使用了一些网站和定义自己的键盘快捷键的Web应用程序。它们通常是不良记录，并提供比传统的基于鼠标的使用没有多大价值。
I have used a number of web sites and web applications that define their own keyboard shortcuts. They are usually poorly documented and offer little value over conventional mouse-based use.
由于Galwegian提到，你应该小心与辅助功能选项干扰，特别是如果你要遵守的 ADA指南。
As Galwegian mentions, you should be careful of interfering with accessibility options, especially if you want to comply with ADA Guidelines for the Web.
您也应该与流行的Web浏览器对于键盘快捷键测试你的Web应用程序。有些人用这些了，生气的时候你的web应用程序重写浏览器的钥匙。
You should also test your web app with respect to keyboard shortcuts in popular web browsers. Some people use these, and get annoyed when your web app overrides the browser's keys.
我认为这将是更值得你花时间来测试标签，以便作为Web表单和其它页面元素。当我填写Web表单，我倾向于使用标签来前进到下一个窗体域，但我发现其中一个选项卡中跳转到一些意想不到的地方在页面上而不是在视觉上相邻的元素一些网站。
I think it would be more worth your time to test tab order for web forms and other page elements. When I fill out web forms, I tend to use tab to advance to the next form field, but I find some web sites in which a tab jumps to some unexpected place on the page instead of to the visually adjacent element.
这篇关于键盘快捷键的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！