本文介绍了模板化代码无法调用正确的构造函数的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧! 问题描述 我正在从HP-UX编译器aCC 5.55切换到aCC 6.13,我得到 以下错误: " templateptr。 h",第20行:错误#2289:无实例 构造函数" defclass :: base :: base"匹配 参数列表 参数类型为:(obj *) :defclass :: base(p) $ b在实例化期间检测到$ b ^ " templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T *)[含 T = obj] "在第50行 " starter.h" 由于obj来自一个defclass,我没有看到问题。 /> 我用来编译的行是: / opt / bin / aCC -o main main.cxx 我在使用GCC 3.4.6的linux机箱上也遇到了类似的问题,而且它不是3.2.3的问题。 我以为它可能是新编译器中新的两个名称查找 但传递+ dep_name和+ nodep_name开关没有产生 差异。 有没有人有任何想法? ----------------- main.cxx ----------------- #include< iostream> #include" starter.h" int main(无效) { 起动器s; 返回0; } -------------- starter.h -------------- #include" templateptr.h" class obj; typedef templateptr< objobj_ptr; class starter { public: starter(){} ~starter(){} obj_ptr p; }; ------------------- - template_ptr.h -------------------- #include " itrefcounted.h" 模板< class T> class templateptr :public defclass: :base { public: inline templateptr(T * p = 0); }; 模板< class T> inline templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T * p) :defclass :: base(p) { } ------------ - defclass.h ------------- class defclass { public: class base { public: / / base(base b); base(defclass * p = 0); defclass * m_ref; }; 朋友类基地; }; --------------- defclass.cxx --------------- #include" defclass.h" itrefcounted :: base(defclass * p) :m_ref(p) { } -------- - obj.h --------- #include" defclass.h" class obj :public defclass { public: obj(){} ~obj(){} }; 解决方案 Keith Halligan写道: 我正在从HP-UX编译器aCC 5.55切换到aCC 6.13而且我得到了 以下错误: " templateptr.h",第20行:错误#2289:无实例 构造函数" defclass :: base :: base" ;匹配 参数列表 参数类型为:(obj *) :defclass :: base(p) $ b在实例化期间检测到$ b ^ " templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T *)[含 T = obj] "在第50行 " starter.h" 由于obj来自一个defclass,我没有看到问题。 /> 我用来编译的行是: / opt / bin / aCC -o main main.cxx 我在使用GCC 3.4.6的linux机箱上也遇到了类似的问题,而且它是b / b的b $ b不是问题。 我以为它可能是新编译器中新的两个名称查找 但传递+ dep_name和+ nodep_name开关没有 的区别。 有人有任何想法吗? 请收集_one_模块中的所有代码,并再次发布*。 [。 ..disconnected和不完整的代码剪断...] V - 请删除资金' 'A'在通过电子邮件回复时 我没有回复最热门的回复,请不要问 5月1日下午6:08,Victor Bazarov < v.Abaza ... @ comAcast.netwrote: Keith Halligan写道: I ''从HP-UX编译器aCC 5.55切换到aCC 6.13,我得到 以下错误: " templateptr.h",第20行:错误#2289:无实例 构造函数" defclass :: base :: base"匹配 参数列表 参数类型为:(obj *) :defclass :: base(p) $ b在实例化期间检测到$ b ^ " templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T *)[含 T = obj] "在第25行的 " starter.h" 因为obj是从defclass派生的,所以我没有看到问题。 我用来编译的行是: / opt / bin / aCC -o main main.cxx 我在使用GCC 3.4.6的linux机箱上也遇到了类似的问题并且它不是3.2.3中的不是问题。 我以为它可能是新编译器中新的两个名称查找 但是传递+ dep_name和+ nodep_name交换机没有产生不同的b $ b差价。 有没有人有任何想法? 请收集_one_模块中的所有代码,并再次发布*。 [。 ..已断开且不完整的代码被剪断...] V - 请删除资金' 'A'在通过电子邮件回复时 我没有回复最热门的回复,请不要问 这就是海报要求的所有来源。 #include< iostream> class obj; typedef templateptr< objobj_ptr; 类启动器 { public: starter(){} ~starter(){} obj_ptr p; }; 模板< class T> class templateptr :public defclass :: base { public: inline templateptr(T * p = 0); } ; 模板< class T> inline templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T * p) :defclass :: base(p) { } class defclass { public: 班级基础 { public: // base( base b); base(defclass * p = 0); defclass * m_ref; } ; 朋友类基地; }; defclass :: base(defclass * p) :m_ref(p) { } class obj :public defclass { public: obj(){} ~obj(){} }; int main(无效) { starter s ; 返回0; } Keith Halligan写道: > #include< iostream> 不需要。 > class obj; typedef templateptr< objobj_ptr; templateptr undefined here > class starter { public: starter(){} ~starter(){} > obj_ptr p; 因为未定义obj_ptr(见上文),这是一个错误。 > }; 模板< class T> class templateptr :public defclass :: base defclass :: base undefined here { public: inline templateptr(T * p = 0); }; 模板< class T> inline templateptr< T> :: templateptr(T * p) :defclass :: base(p) { } class defclass { public: class base { public: // base(base b); base(defclass * p = 0); defclass * m_ref; }; 朋友类基地; }; defclass :: base(defclass * p) 应该是defclass :: base :: base :m_ref(p) { } class obj :public defclass { public: obj(){} ~obj(){} }; int main(无效) { 起始点; 返回0; } I''m switching from the HP-UX compiler aCC 5.55 to aCC 6.13 and I getthe following error: "templateptr.h", line 20: error #2289: no instanceof constructor "defclass::base::base" matches theargument listargument types are: (obj *): defclass::base(p)^detected during instantiation of"templateptr<T>::templateptr(T *) [withT=obj]" at line 50 of"starter.h" Since an obj is derived from a defclass, I don''t see the problem. The line I''m using to compile is: /opt/bin/aCC -o main main.cxxI''m also getting similar issues on a linux box with GCC 3.4.6 and itwasn''t an issue with 3.2.3. I was thinking it might be the new two name lookup in the new compilerbut passing +dep_name and +nodep_name switches are making nodifference. Does anyone have any ideas on it?-----------------main.cxx-----------------#include <iostream>#include "starter.h" int main(void){starter s; return 0;} --------------starter.h--------------#include "templateptr.h" class obj; typedef templateptr<objobj_ptr; class starter{public:starter() {}~starter() {} obj_ptr p; }; --------------------template_ptr.h--------------------#include "itrefcounted.h" template <class T> class templateptr: public defclass::base{public:inline templateptr(T* p = 0); };template <class T>inlinetemplateptr<T>::templateptr(T* p): defclass::base(p){}-------------defclass.h-------------class defclass{public:class base{public:// base (base b);base (defclass* p = 0); defclass *m_ref; };friend class base; };---------------defclass.cxx---------------#include "defclass.h" itrefcounted::base(defclass *p): m_ref(p){}----------obj.h---------#include "defclass.h"class obj: public defclass{public:obj() {}~obj() {} }; 解决方案 Keith Halligan wrote:I''m switching from the HP-UX compiler aCC 5.55 to aCC 6.13 and I getthe following error:"templateptr.h", line 20: error #2289: no instanceof constructor "defclass::base::base" matches the argument list argument types are: (obj *) : defclass::base(p) ^ detected during instantiation of "templateptr<T>::templateptr(T *) [with T=obj]" at line 50 of "starter.h"Since an obj is derived from a defclass, I don''t see the problem.The line I''m using to compile is:/opt/bin/aCC -o main main.cxxI''m also getting similar issues on a linux box with GCC 3.4.6 and itwasn''t an issue with 3.2.3.I was thinking it might be the new two name lookup in the new compilerbut passing +dep_name and +nodep_name switches are making nodifference.Does anyone have any ideas on it?Please collect all the code in _one_ module, and post it *again*. [...disconnected and incomplete code snipped...]V--Please remove capital ''A''s when replying by e-mailI do not respond to top-posted replies, please don''t askOn May 1, 6:08 pm, "Victor Bazarov" <[email protected]:Keith Halligan wrote: I''m switching from the HP-UX compiler aCC 5.55 to aCC 6.13 and I get the following error: "templateptr.h", line 20: error #2289: no instance of constructor "defclass::base::base" matches the argument list argument types are: (obj *) : defclass::base(p) ^ detected during instantiation of "templateptr<T>::templateptr(T *) [with T=obj]" at line 50 of "starter.h" Since an obj is derived from a defclass, I don''t see the problem. The line I''m using to compile is: /opt/bin/aCC -o main main.cxx I''m also getting similar issues on a linux box with GCC 3.4.6 and it wasn''t an issue with 3.2.3. I was thinking it might be the new two name lookup in the new compiler but passing +dep_name and +nodep_name switches are making no difference. Does anyone have any ideas on it? Please collect all the code in _one_ module, and post it *again*. [...disconnected and incomplete code snipped...] V--Please remove capital ''A''s when replying by e-mailI do not respond to top-posted replies, please don''t askHere''s it all in one source as the poster requested. #include <iostream> class obj; typedef templateptr<objobj_ptr; class starter{public:starter() {}~starter() {} obj_ptr p; }; template <class T> class templateptr: public defclass::base{public:inline templateptr(T* p = 0); }; template <class T>inlinetemplateptr<T>::templateptr(T* p): defclass::base(p){ } class defclass{public: class base{public:// base (base b);base (defclass* p = 0); defclass *m_ref; }; friend class base; }; defclass::base(defclass *p): m_ref(p){ } class obj: public defclass{public:obj() {}~obj() {}};int main(void){starter s; return 0; }Keith Halligan wrote:>#include <iostream>unneeded.>class obj;typedef templateptr<objobj_ptr;templateptr undefined here >class starter{ public: starter() {} ~starter() {} obj_ptr p;because obj_ptr is not defined (see above), this is an error.>};template <class T>class templateptr : public defclass::basedefclass::base undefined here{ public: inline templateptr(T* p = 0);};template <class T>inlinetemplateptr<T>::templateptr(T* p) : defclass::base(p){}class defclass{ public: class base { public: // base (base b); base (defclass* p = 0); defclass *m_ref; }; friend class base;};defclass::base(defclass *p)should be defclass::base::base : m_ref(p){}class obj: public defclass{ public: obj() {} ~obj() {}};int main(void){ starter s; return 0;} 这篇关于模板化代码无法调用正确的构造函数的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!
10-24 15:01