本文介绍了Facebook的流程中module.system = haste和module.system = node的区别是什么的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在使用Facebook流程的项目中工作.在流程的高级配置"中,[options]标题有两个选择(module.system = haste和module.system = node).

I work on a project which is using Facebook's flow. In the Advanced Configuration of flow and there are two choices for the [options] heading (module.system=haste and module.system=node).

现在我想知道急速"和节点"的区别是什么.

Now I would like to know what is the difference of "haste" and "node".

推荐答案

它们是两种解决模块的方法:haste是react-native用于打包的模块系统(类似于browserify或用于浏览器的webpack):

They are 2 different ways of resolving modules: haste is the module system used by react-native for packaging (similar to browserify or webpack for browsers):

https://github.com/facebook/node-haste

node模块系统是节点内部使用的方法.

The node module system is the method used by node internally.

关于它们实际的差异 :遗憾的是haste尚无详尽的文档. AFAICT的主要区别在于haste可以将包引用(例如require('underscore'))解析为单个模块,而node实际上将为每个子包使用不同的模块.基本上:使用node,您可以在单个程序中获得多个版本,例如underscore,而对于haste,仅将一个版本的underscore放入最终程序包中.

As for how they actually differ: unfortunately haste does not have extensive documentation yet. AFAICT the primary difference is that haste can resolve packages references (e.g. require('underscore')) to a single module, whereas node will actually use a different module for each sub-package. Basically: with node you can end up with multiple versions of say, underscore in a single program, whereas with haste only one version of underscore is put into the final package.

如果项目中有多个模块版本,则可能导致细微差异,尽管显然haste变得与现有节点行为更加兼容.

This can result in subtle differences if there are multiple versions of a module in a project, though apparently haste is becoming more compatible with existing node behavior.

这篇关于Facebook的流程中module.system = haste和module.system = node的区别是什么的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

10-22 13:01