问题描述
任何人都可以构造一个quine(一个程序,它会生成自己的源文本的副本作为其完整输出": http://www.nyx.net/~gthompso/quine.htm )中的R? ([quine]标签在Python,Java等中引出了很多示例,但在R中显然没有.)
Has anyone constructed a quine ("A program that generates a copy of its own source text as its complete output": http://www.nyx.net/~gthompso/quine.htm) in R? (The [quine] tag pulls up lots of examples in Python, Java, ... but apparently none in R.)
f <- function() { body() }
即将结束:
> f()
{
body()
}
但缺少函数的名称.
最短的可能性怎么样?最容易混淆?
How about the shortest possibility? Most obfuscated?
编辑:从下面的各种答案中,似乎有多种方法可以定义自我指称和必须发生的环境:
edit: from the variety of answers below, it seems that there are a variety of ways to define self-referentiality and the environment in which it must occur:
- 在R环境中:函数
->
函数(@ bill_080) - 在OS/shell环境中:程序
->
程序[或多或少等同于程序->
文本]:(@kohske) - other:函数
->
文本(@ JoshUlrich,@ James,问题如上定义)
- within the R environment: function
->
function (@bill_080) - within the OS/shell environment: program
->
program [more or less equivalent to program->
text]: (@kohske) - other: function
->
text (@JoshUlrich, @James, problem as defined above)
注意:
- @Spacedman指出的R-help的线程(似乎强调简短而不是混淆)表明
identical(quine,quine())
是一个很好的测试用例,尽管它很棘手,因为环境会随身携带:identical(quine,quine(),ignore.environment=TRUE)
可能会更容易. - 最近(2015年10月)博客帖子提供了另一个答案...
- The thread from R-help pointed out by @Spacedman (which seems to emphasize obfuscation over brevity) suggests that
identical(quine,quine())
is a good test case, although it's tricky because environments get carried along:identical(quine,quine(),ignore.environment=TRUE)
might be easier. - A recent (Oct 2015) blog post provides another answer ...
推荐答案
这是我能想到的最短的方法:
This is the shortest I can come up with:
> "f" <- function() call("<-", "f", f)
> f()
"f" <- function ()
call("<-", "f", f)
这篇关于构造quines(自我复制功能)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!