问题描述
我使用的 Ploeh.SemanticComparison
神似
,以此来有效地表达映射的预期产出过程(rel=\"nofollow\">上PluralSight )
I'm using Ploeh.SemanticComparison
's Likeness
as a way to effectively express intended outputs of a mapping process (as described in Mark Seemann's excellent Advanced Unit Testing course on PluralSight).
我测试的一些数据已经正确映射,它看起来像这样:
I'm testing some data has mapped correctly, which looks like this:
[Theory, AutoData]
static void ShouldYieldIdentifierUpdatedEvent( Vendor sut, string name, string version, Guid id )
{
var result = sut.SyncProduct( name, version, id );
var expected = new { ProductId = id, Name = name, Version = version };
expected.AsSource().OfLikeness<NewMappingsEvent>()
.Without( y => y.ProgrammaticIdentifier)
.ShouldEqual(result);
}
不过,我不开心: -
However, I'm not happy:-
- 我想一个名字申请的相似性(即我的名字
。没有(Y => y.ProgrammaticIdentifier)
定制) - 我已经失去了对称
Assert.Equal(预期,实际的,比较器)
(但我肯定需要从错误信息ShouldEqual
)
- I want to apply a name to the Resemblance (i.e. name my
.Without( y => y.ProgrammaticIdentifier)
customization) - I've lost the symmetry with
Assert.Equal( expected,actual, comparer)
(but I definitely need the error message fromShouldEqual
)
有没有表达这种清洁方法所表达的约束范围内?
Is there a cleaner way to express this within the expressed constraints?
推荐答案
如果你有所谓的断言助手类 AssertResemblance
(如[4])和静态
帮助像[1]的范围,你可以说它是:
If you had an Assertion helper class called AssertResemblance
(like [4]), and a static
helper like [1] in scope you could say it like:
var expected = new { ProductId = id, Name = name, Version = version };
AssertResemblance.Like( expected, result, WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier );
或者,如果你有一个像[2],你可以做一个扩展方法,如:
Or if you had an extension method like [2], you could do it like:
AssertResemblance.Like( expected,result,x=>x.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier());
或者你可以有两全其美的(无噪音作为第一片段)尚未命名相似(通过具有在一个扩展方法的实际参数impl)通过在扩展方法方面实施的局部静态辅助([2]),如[3]
Or you could have the best of both worlds (no noise as in the first snippet) yet naming the Resemblance (by having the actual impl in an extension method) by implementing a local static helper in terms of the extension method ([2]) as in [3].
[1]
public static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
}
[2]
static class NewMappingsEventResemblances
{
public static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( this Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
}
}
[3]
static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier();
}
[4]
static class AssertResemblance
{
public static void Like<T, T2>( T expected, T2 actual )
{
Like( expected, actual, x => x );
}
public static void Like<T, T2>( T expected, T2 actual, Func<Likeness<T, T2>, Likeness<T, T2>> configureLikeness )
{
var likeness = expected.AsSource().OfLikeness<T2>();
configureLikeness( likeness ).ShouldEqual( actual );
}
}
这篇关于神似 - 打磨和包装的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!