问题描述
查看 unix-socket
,我遇到了以下代码:
When looking at unix-socket
, I came across this code:
let timeout = unsafe {
let mut timeout: libc::timeval = mem::zeroed();
let mut size = mem::size_of::<libc::timeval>() as libc::socklen_t;
try!(cvt(libc::getsockopt(self.0,
libc::SOL_SOCKET,
kind,
&mut timeout as *mut _ as *mut _,
&mut size as *mut _ as *mut _)));
timeout
};
我特别对这些行感到好奇:
I was curious about these lines in particular:
&mut timeout as *mut _ as *mut _,
&mut size as *mut _ as *mut _
为什么必须连续对可变的原始指针执行两次强制转换?为什么只铸一次就不够了?
Why is it necessary to perform two casts to a mutable raw pointer in a row? Why wouldn't it have been sufficient to only cast once?
推荐答案
例如timeout
对应于 *mut c_void
参数:
The timeout
for example corresponds to a *mut c_void
parameter:
pub unsafe extern fn getsockopt(sockfd: c_int, level: c_int, optname: c_int,
optval: *mut c_void, optlen: *mut socklen_t) -> c_int
该文件中的timeout
定义为:
let mut timeout: libc::timeval = mem::zeroed();
所以它的类型是libc::timeval
.现在让我们考虑:
So it's of type libc::timeval
. Now let's consider:
&mut timeout as *mut _ as *mut _
首先您拥有&mut timeout
,所以它的类型为&mut libc::timeval
.然后,您执行as *mut _
将其强制为推断类型的原始可变指针,在这种情况下,该指针与libc::timeval
的类型相同,因此到目前为止的完整类型为:*mut libc::timeval
,与参数类型*mut c_void
.最终的as *mut _
再次推断目标类型,现在是参数类型*mut c_void
,因此最终将*mut libc::timeval
强制为*mut c_void
.
First you have &mut timeout
so that is of type &mut libc::timeval
. Then you do as *mut _
to coerce it to a raw mutable pointer of an inferred type, which in this case is the same type of libc::timeval
, so the full type so far is: *mut libc::timeval
, which doesn't match the parameter type *mut c_void
. The final as *mut _
again infers the target type, which is now the parameter type *mut c_void
, so this finally coerces the *mut libc::timeval
to a *mut c_void
.
这篇关于为什么必须连续对可变的原始指针执行两次强制转换?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!