问题描述
defstruct - 它似乎是设计的。现在可能是，这实际上是Clojure语言的一个弃用的部分，ClojureScript的设计师只是希望大家都移动。 （但这是我的猜测）。
defstruct is not supported in ClojureScript - it would appear to be by design. Now it may be that this is effectively a deprecated part of the Clojure language, and the designers of ClojureScript were just hoping everyone had moved on. (But this is my speculation).
我的问题是： ClojureScript背后的推理不需要Clojure的defstruct？
推荐答案
defstruct 是在语言中有效地弃用，赞成 defrecord 。我们应该继续（基于JVM的）Clojure，所以我希望Clojurescript是一样的。查看以下内容：
defstruct is effectively deprecated in the language, in favor of defrecord. We are supposed to move on in (JVM-based) Clojure, so I would expect Clojurescript to be the same. See the following:
：注意：现在，记录可以更好地为StructMaps提供服务。
Clojure: data structures: "Note: Most uses of StructMaps would now be better served by records."
我应该在哪里在clojure中使用defrecord？对 defrecord 的优点（和缺点）进行了很好的讨论，尽管他不是，主要是与 defstruct 比较。
Alex Miller's answer to "Where should I use defrecord in clojure?" has a nice discussion of advantages (and disadvantages) of defrecord, although he's not, primarily, comparing it with defstruct.
这篇关于ClojureScript背后的原因是什么，不需要Clojure的defstruct？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！