问题描述
我了解RAID 0和RAID 1绝对不是值得存储的关键数据，但是我的问题是为什么将RAID 5或RAID 6与它们混为一谈.与一个我认为比我在管理问题上知识渊博的人(我是一名开发人员/软件工程师)进行的简短讨论指出，一个人应该永远不要将关键数据信任RAID，任何RAID".
我的问题是为什么?对我而言，这没有多大意义，因为RAID是为此专门开发的.如果没有大规模且不可恢复的磁盘故障，RAID应该可以.
在我的上下文中，关键数据是域中每个用户存储其日常所需数据的域中每个用户的文件服务器上的专用文件夹.
I understand how RAID 0 and RAID 1 are definitely not critical data store worthy, but my question is why would RAID 5 or RAID 6 be lumped up with them. A brief discussion with someone I consider much more knowledgeable than I am in administration issues (I''m more a developer/software engineer) had state that one should "never ever trust critical data to RAID, any RAID".
My question is why? it doesn''t make much sense to me because RAID was developed specifically for this. Short of a massive and unrecoverable disk failure, RAID should be fine.
Critical data in my context is a private folder on the fileserver for each user in the domain where they store their day to day needed data.
推荐答案
这篇关于为什么RAID不能被关键数据信任的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！