问题描述
例如，我有以下字符串:"6119726089.12814713"
For example, I have this string: "6119726089.12814713"
如果我执行(string->number "6119726089.12814713")-使用SISC实现，结果为6.119726089128147e9-在Guile实现中为6119726089.128147，但我想要一个准确的数字，例如:611972608912814713/100000000，不损失精度.
If I do (string->number "6119726089.12814713") - using the SISC implementation the result is 6.119726089128147e9 - and in Guile implementation is 6119726089.128147 but I would like an exact number, like: 611972608912814713/100000000 without loss precision.
我想要一个类似(string-> exact)之类的函数.
I'd like a function like (string->exact) or something like this.
注意:请修正我的非母语英语并删除此消息.谢谢.
NOTE: please fix my non-native English and remove this message. Thanks.
推荐答案
使用(string->number "#e6119726089.12814713")精确解析数字.这至少适用于球拍和桂尔.但是，它可能无法在其他Scheme实现上正常工作.他们可以先将其解析为不精确，然后再进行转换.
Use (string->number "#e6119726089.12814713") to parse the number as exact. This works for at least Racket and Guile. It may not work correctly on other Scheme implementations, however; they are at liberty to parse as inexact first, then convert.
这是OP要求的string->exact函数的可移植实现.我已经使用多种输入对它进行了手动测试，但是您应该进行自己的测试以确保它符合您的需求:
Here's a portable implementation of the string->exact function that the OP asked for. I've manually tested it with a range of inputs, but you should do your own testing to ensure it fits your needs:
(define (string->exact str)
(define zero (char->integer #\0))
(let loop ((result #f)
(factor 1)
(seen-dot? #f)
(digits (string->list str)))
(if (null? digits)
(and result (/ result factor))
(let ((cur (car digits))
(next (cdr digits)))
(cond ((and (not result) (not seen-dot?) (char=? cur #\-))
(loop result (- factor) seen-dot? next))
((and (not seen-dot?) (char=? cur #\.))
(loop result factor #t next))
((char<=? #\0 cur #\9)
(loop (+ (* (or result 0) 10) (- (char->integer cur) zero))
(if seen-dot? (* factor 10) factor)
seen-dot? next))
(else #f))))))
这篇关于如何在Scheme Lisp中将字符串转换为准确的数字?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！