问题描述
道歉，如果我的交叉发布冒犯了任何人......
对于一个纯粹的业余爱好者C / C ++程序员，谁想要开发
应用程序在Windows上运行，什么是更好的选择
安装：Visual C ++ Express 2005 Edition还是lcc-win32？有没有人
有什么意见可以分享？
另外，有没有类似于lcc-win32的C ++编译器？
谢谢，
Nimmi
Apologies if my cross posting has offended anyone....
For a pure hobbyist C/C++ programmer, who wants to develop
applications to run on Windows, what would be a better choice to
install: Visual C++ Express 2005 Edition or lcc-win32? Does anyone
have any opinion to share?
Also, is there a C++ compiler akin to lcc-win32?
Thanks,
Nimmi
推荐答案
我从1990年左右开始使用MS编译器（取得了不同的成功），并且最终（不幸的是，最近）他们得到了
相当体面。我
不能保证他们的C [99]支持，但他们的C ++合规性是非常好的
。他们生成快速的代码，并且他们的IDE中的项目管理完全没有坏处。
什么是lcc？
I''ve used MS compilers (with various success) from around 1990, and
eventually (unfortunately, only recently) they got quite decent. I
cannot vouch for their C[99] support, but their C++ compliance is
very good. They produce fast code, and the project management in
their IDE is not bad at all.
What''s "lcc"?
我不知道，抱歉。
V
-
请在通过电子邮件回复时删除资金''A'
我没有回复最热门的回复，请不要问
I don''t know that, sorry.
V
--
Please remove capital ''A''s when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don''t ask
曾经与1990年代相关。据我了解，基本上是一个男人对C和/或
C ++中哪些扩展应该存在的意见。他实施了它。人们必须尊重这一点。但我想，现在
不再那么相关了。
Used to be relevant in the 1990''s. As I understand it, essentially
one man''s opinion on which extensions should really be there in C and
C++. And he implemented it. One must respect that. But I think, now
not so relevant any more.
lcc和lcc-win32之间有区别。我不清楚
的细节;如果你很好奇，请在comp.compilers.lcc中询问。 （两个都不是
这是一个C ++编译器，虽然lcc-win32实现了一些C ++ - 比如G />
对C的扩展。）
-
Keith Thompson（The_Other_Keith）< http：/ /www.ghoti.net/~kst>
圣地亚哥超级计算机中心< *< http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"我们必须做点什么。这是事情。因此，我们必须这样做。
- Antony Jay和Jonathan Lynn，是部长
There''s a distinction between lcc and lcc-win32. I''m not clear on the
details; if you''re curious, ask in comp.compilers.lcc. (Neither of
the is a C++ compiler, though lcc-win32 implements some C++-like
extensions to C.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
仔细阅读后者的comp.lang.c发布历史将导致您选择前者的
。但它们不是唯一的两个选择 -
mingw32基本上是gcc-for-Windows，非常值得一看。
表示，VC ++是一个很好的编译器（至少对于C来说，无论如何，和b / b显然，近年来它的C ++一致性也得到了改善，但是
clc ++人群将纠正我，如果我错了）。
A perusal of the comp.lang.c posting history of the latter will induce
you to select the former. But they are not the only two choices -
mingw32 is basically gcc-for-Windows, and is well worth a look. Having
said that, VC++ is a good compiler (at least for C, anyway, and
apparently its C++ conformance has improved in recent years, too, but
the clc++ crowd will correct me on that if I''m mistaken).
我非常，非常，非常非常罕见地推荐Microsoft
产品，但我偶尔会推荐Visual C给那些需要
a Windows实现的人。如果唯一的选择是在Emperor
Palpatine和Jar-Jar Binks之间，除了加入黑暗面，你能做些什么呢？
（但有/有） /其他替代方案。见上文。）
It is very, very, very, very, very rare for me to recommend a Microsoft
product, but I have occasionally recommended Visual C to people needing
a Windows implementation. And if the only choice is between Emperor
Palpatine and Jar-Jar Binks, what can you do but join the Dark Side?
(But there /are/ other alternatives. See above.)
我不知道任何C ++编译器表面上是由自助式写的
buffoons，但当然它完全是可能这只是我自己的无知。
-
Richard Heathfield< http：// www。 cpax.org.uk>
电子邮件：-www。 + rjh @
谷歌用户：< http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
Usenet是一个奇怪的放置" - dmr 1999年7月29日
I don''t know of any C++ compilers ostensibly written by self-serving
buffoons, but of course it''s entirely possible that this is merely
ignorance on my part.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
这篇关于Visual C ++ Express Edition还是lcc-win32？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！