问题描述
我有合理的经验来管理自己的服务器，所以gogrid风格的管理不是问题.但似乎 mosso 是一种更便宜的标签 - 除了非常难以访问的计算周期条款.任何人都可以分享这一点将非常受欢迎.
I have reasonable experience to manage my own server, so gogrid style management is not a problem. But seems mosso is a tag cheaper somewhat- except the very difficult to access compute cycles terms. Anyone could share about this would be very welcomed.
推荐答案
很简单，Mosso 就像一个经销商"托管.他们为您提供从账单到控制面板的所有白标服务，然后您将其卖回给客户.
It's simple, Mosso is just like a "reseller" hosting. They provide you everything whitelabel from billing to control panel then you sell it back to customers.
如果您是开发人员，我建议您选择 GoGrid.首先，Mosso 不提供 SSH 访问.其次，如果您是 RoR/Mongrel 用户，您的 RAM 将受到限制(除非您在 100 美元之外支付额外费用).此外，GoGrid 允许您选择服务器映像(CentOS、Redhat、Windows)，并为 RoR 和 LAMP 提供一些开箱即用的支持.
If you are developer, I recommend you choose GoGrid. Firstly, Mosso doesn't provide SSH access. Secondly, if you are RoR/Mongrel user, you are capped to limited RAM (unless you pay extra in addition to $100). Moreover, GoGrid allows you to choose server image (CentOS, Redhat, Windows) with some out-of-the-box support for RoR and LAMP.
此外，GoGrid 会为您提供初始积分(如果您使用 MS-WEBFWRD，则为 50 美元或 95 美元)供您在实际支付之前试用.
Somemore, GoGrid provides you initial credits ($50 or $95 if you use MS-WEBFWRD) for you to try out before actually paying for it.
这篇关于mosso 和 gogrid 哪个更好?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！