问题描述
当我刚刚时,我遇到了一个有趣的问题:
data Gender = Male |女性
派生(方程式,显示)
数据年龄=婴儿|孩子| PreTeen |成人
派生(Eq,Show,Ord)
data衣物=裤子性别年龄
|衬衫性别年龄
|裙子年龄 - 假定为女性
派生(显示,公式)
假设我希望使用记录语法编写最终数据类型:
data衣服=裤子{gender :: Gender,age :: Age}
|衬衫{性别::性别,年龄::年龄}
|裙子{age :: Age}
导出(Show,Eq)
问题是,我希望 gender $ skirt foo
始终评估为女
(不管 foo
,这是一个年龄
)。我可以想到几种方法来实现这一点,但他们要求我使用智能构造函数,理论上允许
- >裙子男foo 但不暴露构造函数
- 定义我自己的
性别
函数
使用#1,通过不暴露模块中的构造函数,我可以有效地防止模块的用户利用记录语法。对于#2,我必须完全放弃记录语法,或者定义一个额外的函数 gender'
,这又会破坏记录语法。
有没有办法既利用记录语法,又为我的构造函数提供了一个默认,不可更改的值?我也接受非记录语法解决方案(镜头,也许是?),只要它们一样优雅(或更多)。
如果没有令人信服的反例,答案似乎是否。
As I was writing up an answer just now, I ran across an interesting problem:
data Gender = Male | Female
deriving (Eq, Show)
data Age = Baby | Child | PreTeen | Adult
deriving (Eq, Show, Ord)
data Clothing = Pants Gender Age
| Shirt Gender Age
| Skirt Age -- assumed to be Female
deriving (Show, Eq)
Suppose I wish to write the final data type with record syntax:
data Clothing = Pants {gender :: Gender, age :: Age}
| Shirt {gender :: Gender, age :: Age}
| Skirt {age :: Age}
deriving (Show, Eq)
The problem is, I want gender $ Skirt foo
to always evaluate to Female
(regardless of foo
, which is an Age
). I can think of a few ways to accomplish this, but they require that I either
- use smart constructors, theoretically allowing
Skirt Male foo
but not exposing Constructors - define my own
gender
function
With #1, by not exposing the constructor in the module, I effectively prevent users of the module from taking advantage of record syntax. With #2, I have to forego record syntax entirely, or define an additional function gender'
, which again defeats record syntax.
Is there a way to both take advantage of record syntax, and also provide a "default", unchangeable value for one of my constructors? I am open to non-record-syntax solutions as well (lenses, perhaps?) as long as they are just as elegant (or moreso).
In the absence of a convincing counterexample, the answer seems to be "no".
这篇关于为访问者记录语法默认值的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!