问题描述
我有一个以字典为参数的函数.我将传递给各种字典的字典，这些字典比函数内部使用的字典要多.另外，我想在函数定义中查看需要哪些键.所以我写
I have a function that has a dictionary as an argument. I will pass various dictionaries to it that have more entries than the few used inside the function. Additionally, I would like to see in the function definition what keys are required. So I write
def fun(indict=dict(apple=None, pear=None)):
但是，该函数现在接受任何输入作为indict.有没有一种聪明的写作方式
However, the function now accepts any input as indict. Is there a smart way for writing
any dictionary that has at least the keys 'apple' and 'pear' is accepted.
类似
def fun(indict=dict(apple=NeedsToBeSpecified, pear=NeedsToBeSpecified)):
推荐答案
在python3.x中，您可以使用功能注释:
In python3.x, you can use function annotations:
>>> def foo(indict: dict(apple=None, pear=None)):
... print(indict)
...
>>> foo(dict())
{}
您甚至可以为现在更广为接受的(解释器)Ellipsis文字
You can even go crazy with the now more widely accepted (by the interpreter) Ellipsis literal
>>> def foo(indict: dict(apple=None, pear=None, extra_items=...)) -> int:
... if any(x not in indict for x in ('apple', 'pear')):
... raise ValueError('message here...')
... print(indict)
... return 3
...
>>> foo({})
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in foo
ValueError: message here...
>>> foo({'apple':6, 'pear':4})
{'pear': 4, 'apple': 6}
3
>>> foo({'apple':6, 'pear':4, 'carrot':30000})
{'carrot': 30000, 'pear': 4, 'apple': 6}
3
从我的第一个示例中可以看到，注释没有强制执行.您必须在函数本身中执行验证，尽管我想您可以从注解内省所需的键，如果您想使其保持DRY，但是仅仅花2步就不值得了键...
As you can see from my first example, the annotation it doesn't enforce anything. You'd have to perform the validation in the function itself although I suppose you could introspect the required keys from the annotations if you wanted to keep it DRY, but it's probably not worth the effort for just 2 keys...
在python2.x中(以及更传统的情况)，也许您只想将信息放入文档字符串中；-)-而且我建议您也对python3.x这样做，因为这是传统的地方去寻找文件...
In python2.x (and more traditionally), perhaps you'd just want to put the information in the docstring ;-) -- And I'd recommend you do that for python3.x as well since that's the traditional place to go looking for documentation ...
keys = foo.__annotations__['indict'].keys() - {'extra_items'}
更新请注意，现在像mypy这样的奇特事物闲坐着，这个答案可能有些过时了.您可以考虑使用 TypedDict 进行注释>.如果您使用mypy这样的类型检查器，那应该为您的用户设定期望，甚至可能有助于捕获一些错误.
UPDATENote that now with fancy things like mypy sitting around, this answer is maybe a little outdated. You might consider annotating with a TypedDict from mypy_extensions. That should set expectations for your users and maybe even help catch some bugs if you use a type-checker like mypy.
from mypy_extensions import TypedDict
class Apple:
"""Represent an Apple."""
class Pear:
"""Represent a Pear."""
# "annotation-type" for a dictionary that has an apple and pear key whose values are Apple and Pear instances.
FruitBowl = TypedDict("FruitBowl": {"apple": Apple, "Pear": Pear})
def foo(indict: FruitBowl) -> int:
...
这篇关于带有一些强制键作为功能输入的字典的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！