问题描述
methodA(){
methodB()方法B在我的@Transactional方法中提交事务时遇到问题()
}
@Transactional
methodB(){
...
em.persist();
...
em.flush();
log(OK);
}
当我从methodA()调用methodB()时,我可以在日志中看到确定。但后来我得到了
无法提交JPA事务;嵌套异常是javax.persistence.RollbackException:标记为rollbackOnly的事务org.springframework.transaction.TransactionSystemException:无法提交JPA事务;嵌套异常是javax.persistence.RollbackException:在org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager.doCommit(JpaTransactionManager.java:521)处标记为rollbackOnly
的事务在org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager处
.processCommit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:754)
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:723)
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport .java:393)
在org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)上的
)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.Cglib2AopProxy $ DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(Cglib2AopProxy.java:622)
at m ethodA()...
- methodB的上下文完全缺失例外情况 - 这是我想的吗?
- methodB()中的某些内容将事务标记为仅回滚?我怎样才能找到它?是否有例如一种方法来检查像
getCurrentTransaction()。isRollbackOnly()?
之类的东西 - 像这样我可以遍历该方法并找到原因。 b $ b
我终于明白了这个问题:
<$ p $ (){
methodB()
@Transactional(noRollbackFor = Exception.class)
methodB(){
...
try {
methodC()
} catch(...){...}
log(OK);
}
@Transactional
methodC(){
throw new ...();
}
即使 methodB code>具有正确的注释,
methodC
不会。当抛出异常时,第二个 @Transactional
只会将第一个事务标记为Rollback。
I am having issues with committing a transaction within my @Transactional method:
methodA() {
methodB()
}
@Transactional
methodB() {
...
em.persist();
...
em.flush();
log("OK");
}
When I call methodB() from methodA(), the method passes successfuly and I can see "OK" in my logs. But then I get
Could not commit JPA transaction; nested exception is javax.persistence.RollbackException: Transaction marked as rollbackOnly org.springframework.transaction.TransactionSystemException: Could not commit JPA transaction; nested exception is javax.persistence.RollbackException: Transaction marked as rollbackOnly
at org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager.doCommit(JpaTransactionManager.java:521)
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processCommit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:754)
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:723)
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:393)
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:120)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.Cglib2AopProxy$DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(Cglib2AopProxy.java:622)
at methodA()...
- The context of methodB is completely missing in the exception - which is okay I suppose?
- Something within the methodB() marked the transaction as rollback only? How can I find it out? Is there for instance a way to check something like
getCurrentTransaction().isRollbackOnly()?
- like this I could step through the method and find the cause.
I finally understood the problem:
methodA() {
methodB()
}
@Transactional(noRollbackFor = Exception.class)
methodB() {
...
try {
methodC()
} catch (...) {...}
log("OK");
}
@Transactional
methodC() {
throw new ...();
}
What happens is that even though the methodB
has the right annotation, the methodC
does not. When the exception is thrown, the second @Transactional
marks the first transaction as Rollback only anyway.
这篇关于仅标记为回滚的事务:如何查找原因的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!