问题描述
在集合框架中，我们有接口 List 和类 AbstractList:
In the Collection Framework we have the interface List and the class AbstractList:
AbstractList implements List
和 ArrayList 扩展了 AbstractList 和
implements List
我的问题:为什么 ArrayList 有 implements List 子句?
My question: why does ArrayList have the implements List clause?
如果ArrayList继承了AbstractList，而AbstractList实现了List，那不是说ArrayList实现了List吗?
If ArrayList extends AbstractList and AbstractList implements List, can't we say, that ArrayList implement List?
推荐答案
是的.本来可以省略的.但是因此可以立即看出它是一个 List.否则需要额外点击代码/文档.我认为这就是原因 - 清晰.
Yes. It could've been omitted. But thus it is immediately visible that it is a List. Otherwise an extra click through the code / documentation would be required. I think that's the reason - clarity.
并添加 Joeri Hendrickx 评论的内容 - 这是为了表明 ArrayList 实现了 List.AbstractList 全图只是为了方便和减少 List 实现之间的代码重复.
And to add what Joeri Hendrickx commented - it is for the purpose of showing that ArrayList implements List. AbstractList in the whole picture is just for convenience and to reduce code duplication between List implementations.
这篇关于为什么 ArrayList 有“实现列表"?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！