问题描述
为什么这项工作：
std::pair<int, int> p = {1,2};
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> vp = { {1,2}, {3,4} };
但是，这不？
std::array<int, 2> a = {1,2}; // still ok
std::vector<std::array<int, 2>> va = { {1,2}, {3,4} };
使用G ++ 4.5.1与 -std =的C ++ 0x ，第二行失败：
错误：无法转换'{{1,2}，{3,4}} 到'的std ::矢量＆lt; STD ::阵列＆LT; INT，2U＆GT; ＆GT;
感谢
推荐答案
不幸的是，的std ::阵列没有一个初始化列表构造。事实上，它拥有的没有的任何用户定义的构造函数 - 这个功能是由C ++ 03的后遗症，其中省略所有用户定义的构造是为了使C-风格的大括号初始化的唯一途径。它是IMHO在当前的标准中的缺陷。
Unfortunately, std::array does not have an initializer list constructor. Indeed, it has no user-defined constructor whatsoever -- this "feature" is a leftover from C++03 where omitting all user-defined constructors was the only way to enable the C-style brace initialization. It is IMHO a defect in the current standard.
那么，为什么不内置括号的初始化工作在这种情况下？让我们来看看的std ::阵列看起来引擎盖下：
So why doesn't built-in brace initialization work in this case? Let's see what std::array looks like under the hood:
template <typename T, int i> struct array {
T data[i];
// ...
}
好了，并不意味着我们不得不使用的双的括号中的初始化（一对用于阵列，另一对为数据成员？
Ok, so doesn't that mean we'd have to use double braces in the initializer (one pair for array, another pair for the data member?
std::array<int, 2> a = { {1, 2} };
C（因此C ++）拥有约的梅开二度省音的，允许内括号遗漏，除非出现混淆一个特殊的规则。 阵列利用此功能，让我们写
C (and consequently C++) has a special rule about brace elision, permitting the omission of the inner braces unless there is an ambiguity. array exploits this feature, allowing us to write
std::array<int, 2> a = { 1, 2 };
那么，为什么没有在原岗位工作的例子吗？由于梅开二度省音在C风格集合初始化的情况下才允许，而不是是否有什么复杂的更多参与，如用户自定义的初始化列表构造。
So why doesn't the example in the original post work? Because brace elision is only permitted in the context of a C-style aggregate initialization, not if there's anything more complicated involved, such as an user-defined initializer list constructor.
下面的应的工作，不过，因为丑陋的，因为它是：
The following should work, though, as ugly as it is:
std::vector<std::array<int, 2>> vp = { {{1,2}}, {{3,4}} };
这是不是这样，至少在GCC 4.5和gcc 4.6其实，在我看来，以指示编译器错误。我不能完全肯定，虽然。
The fact that it does not, at least on gcc 4.5 and gcc 4.6, seems to me to indicate a compiler bug. I'm not completely sure about it, though.
这问题有点相关的：How我做初始化与initializer_list成员阵列？
这篇关于阵列的C ++矢量的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！