问题描述
在F＃中：
> let f x = x + 2 ;;
val f：int - > int
> let g x = f x ;;
val g：int - > int
> g 10 ;;
val it：int = 12
> let f x = x + 3 ;;
val f：int - > int
> g 10 ;;
val it：int = 12
在Clojure中：
1：1 user => （defn f [x]（+ x 2））
＃'user / f
1：2 user => （defn g [x]（f x））
＃'user / g
1：3 user => （g 10）
12
1：4 user => （defn f [x]（+ x 3））
＃'user / f
1：5 user => （g 10）
13
注意，在Clojure中，f的最新版本被调用在最后一行。在F＃中，仍旧调用旧版本的f。为什么这个和它如何工作？
如 > shadowing 时，输入一个名称已存在的函数（有关阴影的更多信息，请参阅例如）。这意味着当你运行你的代码时，F＃编译器看到这样的东西：
>令f 1 x = x + 2;
> let g @ 1 x = f @ 1 x ;;
> g @ 1 10 ;;
val it：int = 12
> let f 2 x = x + 3 ;;
> g @ 1 10 ;;
val it：int = 12
F＃使用一些名称不能直接使用来区分值的版本。另一方面，Clojure的行为可能最好被理解为一个大的函数字典。使用伪语法，像这样：
>符号[f] = fun x-> x + 2 ;;
>符号[g] = fun x-> symbol [f] x ;;
>符号[g] 10;
val it：int = 12
>符号[f] = fun x-> x + 3 ;;
>符号[g] 10;
val it：int = 13
>
作为旁注，Clojure方法存在一个可能的问题（至少对于像F＃这样的语言）。你可以声明一个类型的函数，使用它，然后，下一个命令可以改变函数的类型。如果F＃使用Clojure方法，下面的示例应该如何工作？
>让f a b = a + b ;;
> let g x = f x x;;
> let f（）= printff！;;
> g 0 ;;
函数 g 使用 f ，因为它有两个类型 int 的参数，但是thrid行改变了函数的类型。这使得Clojure方法对于类型检查的语言有点棘手。
In F#:
> let f x = x + 2;;
val f : int -> int
> let g x = f x;;
val g : int -> int
> g 10;;
val it : int = 12
> let f x = x + 3;;
val f : int -> int
> g 10;;
val it : int = 12
In Clojure:
1:1 user=> (defn f [x] (+ x 2))
#'user/f
1:2 user=> (defn g [x] (f x))
#'user/g
1:3 user=> (g 10)
12
1:4 user=> (defn f [x] (+ x 3))
#'user/f
1:5 user=> (g 10)
13
Note that in Clojure the most recent version of f gets called in the last line. In F# however still the old version of f is called. Why is this and how does this work?
As gabe said, F# interactive uses shadowing of values when you enter a function with a name that already exists (for more info on shadowing, see for example this SO question). This means that the F# compiler sees something like this when you run your code:
> let f@1 x = x + 2;;
> let g@1 x = f@1 x;;
> g@1 10;;
val it : int = 12
> let f@2 x = x + 3;;
> g@1 10;;
val it : int = 12
F# uses some mangled name (like @) that you cannot use directly to distinguish between versions of the value. On the other hand, Clojure's behavior can be probably best understood as a big dictionary of functions. Using pseudo-syntax, something like this:
> symbols[f] = fun x -> x + 2;;
> symbols[g] = fun x -> symbols[f] x;;
> symbols[g] 10;;
val it : int = 12
> symbols[f] = fun x -> x + 3;;
> symbols[g] 10;;
val it : int = 13
This should make the distinction quite clear.
As a side-note, there is one possible problem with the Clojure approach (at least for a language like F#). You can declare a function of some type, use it and then, the next command can change the type of the function. If F# used the Clojure approach, how should the following example work?
> let f a b = a + b;;
> let g x = f x x;;
> let f () = printf "f!";;
> g 0;;
The function g uses f as if it had two parameters of type int, but the thrid line changes the type of the function. This makes the Clojure approach a bit tricky for type-checked languages.
这篇关于调用重定义函数时，F＃和Clojure的区别的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！