问题描述
根据原始提案，关于首选安全来源以提供强大的新功能"
特别强大"并不意味着诸如:新的呈现和布局功能，CSS选择器，无害的JavaScript API(例如showModalDialog)之类的东西.我希望HTML5中的大多数新作品都属于此类.请讨论！
"Particularly powerful" would not mean things like: new rendering and layout features, CSS selectors, innocuous JavaScript APIs like showModalDialog, or the like. I expect that the majority of new work in HTML5 fits in this category. Please discuss!
但是由于某些原因，服务人员却被归为第一类.发生这种情况有什么规范的原因吗?
Yet for some reason service workers have been thrown into the first category. Is there any canonical reason for why this happened?
推荐答案
来自Google的杰克·阿奇博尔德(Jake Archibald)，来自《官方服务工作者》草案规范沙盒，HTML5rocks的Matt Gaunt后来引用指出
Jake Archibald from Google in official Service Workers draft spec sandbox,later cited by Matt Gaunt from HTML5rocks states that
这篇关于为什么服务人员只能通过HTTPS工作?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！