安全C草案

本文介绍了安全C草案的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述 29岁程序员，3月因学历无情被辞！ http://www.open-std.org/ jtc1 / sc22 / wg14 / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdf 有没有人走了通过这个？ 这有用吗？是否会达到下一个标准？http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...docs/n1135.pdfHas anyone gone through this?Is this useful? Will it make it to the next standard?推荐答案 是。Yes. 不在我看来，但其他人不同。Not in my opinion, but others differ. 让我们不希望。 Robert GambleLet''s hope not.Robert Gamble 是。Yes. 不在我看来，但其他人不同。Not in my opinion, but others differ. 让我们不希望。Let''s hope not. 好​​吧，让我们至少希望我们不会开始设计新标准，直到 C99已被广泛实施。什么是*点*？ - Richard Heathfield Usenet是一个奇怪的地方 - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk 电子邮件：rjh在上述域名中， - www。Well, let''s at least hope that we don''t start designing a new Standard untilC99 has been widely implemented. What would be the *point*?--Richard Heathfield"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.ukemail: rjh at the above domain, - www. 是。 Yes. 不在我看来，但其他人不同。 Not in my opinion, but others differ. 让我们不希望。 Let''s hope not. 好​​吧，让我们至少希望我们不会开始设计新标准，直到 C99已被广泛实施。重点是什么*？Well, let''s at least hope that we don''t start designing a new Standard untilC99 has been widely implemented. What would be the *point*? 我认为新标准具有经过深思熟虑的功能，而b / b $ b反映了社区最重要的价值可能实际上有助于增加/> 其他C99功能的采用速度比不快。如果一个新的 版本提供的功能可以让社区大多数人感到兴奋并且反弹，那么毫无疑问 的实现者会以更快的速度实施它。这样一个b 的冒险需要非常小心，不要陷入各种剧烈的变化，特殊利益和（某些 考虑）C99带来的不必要的臃肿以免它贬值 进一步危及标准的相关性，但成功可能是唯一赎回的东西它。 TR 24731符合至少 特殊利益的资格。臃肿。 Robert GambleI think that a new Standard with carefully thought-out features whichreflect what the community values most may actually serve to increaseadoption of the rest of the C99 features faster than not. If a newversion provided functionality that the majority of the community couldget excited about and rally behind there is little doubt thatimplementors would move at a much faster pace to implement it. Such aventure would need to be extremely careful not to get bogged down withthe kinds of drastic changes, "special interests", and (what someconsider) unnecessary bloat that C99 brought along with it lest itfurther jeopardize the relevance of the Standard, but success may bethe only thing that redeems it. TR 24731 qualifies for at least"special interest" and bloat.Robert Gamble 这篇关于安全C草案的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！ 上岸，阿里云！