问题描述
考虑（以及）：
Considering the following code (and the fact that VirtualAlloc() returns a void*):
BYTE* pbNext = reinterpret_cast<BYTE*>(
VirtualAlloc(NULL, cbAlloc, MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_READWRITE));
为什么选择 reinterpret_cast c $ c> static_cast ？
why is reinterpret_cast chosen instead of static_cast?
我以前认为 reinterpret_cast 例如将指针转换为整数类型（例如 DWORD_PTR ），而是从 void * 转换为 BYTE * ，不是 static_cast 确定吗？
I used to think that reinterpret_cast is OK for e.g. casting pointers to and from integer types (like e.g. DWORD_PTR), but to cast from a void* to a BYTE*, isn't static_cast OK?
C ++标准对这种情况有一个偏好，建议改用一种方法
Does the C++ standard have a preference for this case, suggesting a way instead of the other?
推荐答案
在这种情况下，任一转换都是可以接受的，所以你是正确的 static_cast 是可以的。
Either cast is acceptable in that situation, so you are correct that static_cast is okay.
当在两个指针类型之间转换时，可能是指针中保存的特定内存地址需要改变。
When converting between two pointer types, it's possible that the specific memory address held in the pointer needs to change.
这是两个演员不同的地方。 static_cast 将进行适当的调整。 reinterpret_cast 将避免更改指针的存储值。
That's where the two casts differ. static_cast will make the appropriate adjustment. reinterpret_cast will avoid changing the pointer's stored value.
因为这个原因， $ c> static_cast ，除非您知道，需要 reinterpret_cast 。
For that reason, it's a good general rule to static_cast between pointer types unless you know that reinterpret_cast is desired.
这篇关于投放指针类型的正确方式的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！