成员的mem_fn至mem_fn

问题描述

这是跟进的问题

mem_fn成为成员对象的功能

这是当前代码.

#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>

struct Int
{
    Int(int _x = 0) : x(_x) {}
    int GetInt() const { return x; }
    int x;
};

struct IntWrapper
{
    IntWrapper(int _x = 0) : test(_x) {}
    int GetWrappedInt() const { return test.GetInt(); }
    Int test;
};

template<class ContainerT, class Mem> constexpr auto maxElem(const ContainerT& _container, Mem _Pm)
{
    auto memFn = std::mem_fn(_Pm);
    return memFn(std::max_element(_container.cbegin(), _container.cend(), [&](auto _rhs, auto _lhs) { return memFn(_rhs) < memFn(_lhs); }));
}

int main()
{
    {
        std::vector<Int> vec;
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
        {
            vec.push_back(i * 11 % 7); // some random values
        }
        int m = maxElem(vec, &Int::GetInt);
        int n = maxElem(vec, &Int::x);
    }

    {
        std::vector<IntWrapper> vec;
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
        {
            vec.push_back(i * 7 % 11); // some random values
        }
        int m = maxElem(vec, &IntWrapper::GetWrappedInt);
        //int o = maxElem(vec, ???) // what if GetWrappedInt didn't exist?
    }

    return 0;
}

最初的问题是关于通过IntWrapper对象检索Int结构的x值.我之所以使用mem_fn是因为它似乎无法区分返回int和int成员变量的函数(在以下几行中看到:

The original question was about retrieving the x value of the Int struct through anIntWrapper object. I used mem_fn for this because it doesn't seem to distinguish between a function returning an int and an int member variable (Seen in these lines:

        int m = maxElem(vec, &Int::GetInt);
        int n = maxElem(vec, &Int::x);

IntWrapper对象的解决方案是添加.test

The solution for IntWrapper objects was to add .test

auto y = std::mem_fn(&Int::GetInt);
auto b = y(wrapper.test);

拨打电话.但是，在maxElem函数中，我无法执行此操作.

to the call. However, in the maxElem function, I cannot do this.

我想知道是否有一种方法可以这样构造调用:mem_fn从IntWrapper对象直接转到int x变量(不使用helper函数，并假定所有成员都是公开).

I'm wondering if there is a way to formulate the call in such a way that the mem_fn goes from the IntWrapper object directly to the int x variable (Without the helper function and assuming that all members are public).

        //int o = maxElem(vec, ???) // what if GetWrappedInt didn't exist?

最初的方法是auto y = std::mem_fn(&IntWrapper::test.GetInt); // ERROR，它当然不会编译，但是可以说明问题.

The original approach was auto y = std::mem_fn(&IntWrapper::test.GetInt); // ERROR, which of course does not compile, but shows the idea.

提前谢谢！

推荐答案

您不能将std::mem_fn与指向成员的指针(例如，指向成员的成员的指针)不同.因此，您必须使用它.在您的特定情况下，您可以使用

You cannot use std::mem_fn with something different than a pointer to member (such as a pointer to member of member). So, you must use that. In your particular case, you can achieve that with

std::vector<IntWrapper> vec;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
{
    vec.push_back(i * 11 % 7); // some random values
}
auto m = maxElem(vec, &IntWrapper::GetWrappedInt);

但是，我强烈建议您尽可能使用 lambda表达式.应该将std::mem_fn视为已弃用，因为AFAIK并不具有至少通过其他方式(例如lambda)无法达到的目的.

However, I strongly advise you to use lambda expressions whenever possible. std::mem_fn should be considered as if deprecated, since, AFAIK, it serves no purpose that cannot be achieved at least as well by other means, i.e. a lambda.

这篇关于成员的mem_fn至mem_fn的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！