遍历遍历RefCell的循环引用

问题描述

我正在学习Rust，并尝试编写一个双向链接列表.但是，我已经陷入了典型的迭代遍历实现中.我得到的印象是借用检查器/删除检查器过于严格，当它从RefCell越过函数边界时，无法推断出借用的正确生命周期.我需要重复设置一个变量绑定(在本例中为curr)以引用其当前内容:

I'm learning Rust and tried coding a doubly-linked list. However, I'm stuck already at a typical iterative traversal implementation. I'm getting the impression that the borrow checker / drop checker is too strict and cannot infer the correct lifetime for the borrow when it crosses the function boundary from RefCell. I need to repeatedly set a variable binding (curr in this case) to the borrow of its current contents:

use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::rc::Rc;

pub struct LinkedList<T> {
    head: Option<Rc<RefCell<LinkedNode<T>>>>,
    // ...
}

struct LinkedNode<T> {
    value: T,
    next: Option<Rc<RefCell<LinkedNode<T>>>>,
    // ...
}

impl<T> LinkedList<T> {
    pub fn insert(&mut self, value: T, idx: usize) -> &mut LinkedList<T> {
        // ... some logic ...

        // This is the traversal that fails to compile.
        let mut curr = self.head.as_ref().unwrap();
        for _ in 1..idx {
            curr = curr.borrow().next.as_ref().unwrap()
        }

        // I want to use curr here.
        // ...
        unimplemented!()
    }
}

编译器抱怨:

无NLL

error[E0597]: borrowed value does not live long enough
  --> src/lib.rs:22:20
   |
22 |             curr = curr.borrow().next.as_ref().unwrap()
   |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ temporary value does not live long enough
23 |         }
   |         - temporary value dropped here while still borrowed
...
28 |     }
   |     - temporary value needs to live until here
   |
   = note: consider using a `let` binding to increase its lifetime

使用NLL

error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
  --> src/lib.rs:22:20
   |
22 |             curr = curr.borrow().next.as_ref().unwrap()
   |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |                    |
   |                    creates a temporary which is freed while still in use
   |                    a temporary with access to the borrow is created here ...
23 |         }
   |         -
   |         |
   |         temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
   |         ... and the borrow might be used here, when that temporary is dropped and runs the destructor for type `std::cell::Ref<'_, LinkedNode<T>>`
   |
   = note: consider using a `let` binding to create a longer lived value
   = note: The temporary is part of an expression at the end of a block. Consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped.

对于这个问题的迭代解决方案(非递归)，我非常感谢.

I would really appreciate a iterative solution (non-recursive) to this problem.

推荐答案

您可以克隆Rc以避免出现生命周期问题:

You can clone Rc to avoid lifetime issues:

let mut curr = self.head.as_ref().unwrap().clone();
for _ in 1..idx {
    let t = curr.borrow().next.as_ref().unwrap().clone();
    curr = t;
}

这篇关于遍历遍历RefCell的循环引用的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！