问题描述
这是正确使用 Blockquote ， q 和 cite ？
<p>
<blockquote>Type HTML in the textarea above, <q>and it will magically appear</q> in the frame below.
</blockquote>
<cite><a href="http://stackoverflow.com">refrence url</a>
</p>
使用 Blockquote ， q 语义正确吗？或两者都是表现元素，所以不应该使用？
Is use of Blockquote, q semantically correct? or both are presentational element , so should not be used?
推荐答案
它们不是表示元素 - blockquote 表示块引用， q 表示内联引用， cite 表示对名称，工作，标准，URL等的引用。
Yes. They are not presentational elements — blockquote represents a block quotation, q represents an inline quotation, and cite represents a reference to a name, work, standard, URL, etc.
你有一些，这是很常见的blockquote。 blockquote元素不能在段落内，在HTML4中实际需要包含段落。您的片段中的 p 和 blockquote 元素的嵌套需要反转。
You do have some validation errors that are fairly common with blockquote. A blockquote element cannot be inside a paragraph, and in HTML4 actually needs to contain paragraphs. The nesting of the p and blockquote elements in your fragment needs to be reversed.
blockquote 元素（也是 q 元素）可以有一个 cite 属性来指定引用来自的URI。 用户代理应该使该链接可用于用户，并且HTML4根本不说任何东西。我将在 cite 属性中包括URI，并将其作为内联链接，因为浏览器不处理它。
The blockquote element (also the q element) can optionally have a cite attribute to specify a URI where the quote came from. HTML5 says user agents should make that link available to the user, and HTML4 doesn't say anything at all. I would include the URI both in the cite attribute and as an inline link, since browsers don't handle it.
<blockquote cite="http://stackoverflow.com">
<p>Type HTML in the textarea above, <q>and it will magically
appear</q> in the frame below.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
<cite><a href="http://stackoverflow.com">reference url</a></cite>
</p>
这篇关于正确使用Blockquote，q和cite？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！