评论以反斜杠结尾后，NASM/Yasm放弃了致电

问题描述

我目前正在尝试构建自己的引导加载程序，并发现一些奇怪的东西.

I am currently trying to built my own boot loader and noticed something peculiar.

当下面的代码与NASM或Yasm一起汇编而没有标记的NOP命令时，二进制文件中将缺少以下CALL.带有NOP时，CALL会正确组装，但是二进制代码中不存在操作码0x90(NOP)(由于NOP的性质，后来可以理解).

When below code is assembled with NASM or Yasm without the marked NOP command the following CALL is missing from the binary. With the NOP included the CALL is correctly assembled but the op code 0x90 (NOP) is not present in the binary (later is understandable due to the nature of NOP).

to_hex_ascii:
        add al, '0'
        cmp al, 0x3a
        jl .end
;           add al, 0x07
            add al, 0x27
    .end:
        ret

print_word_hex:
        push bp
        mov bp, sp

        mov dx, [bp + 4]
        push dx
        mov al, dh
        push ax             ;\
        nop                 ; | <- NOP in question
        call print_lsb_hex  ; print_lsb_hex(ax);
        add sp, 2           ;/
        pop dx
        jmp print_lsb_hex.continue
print_lsb_hex:
        push bp
        mov bp, sp

        mov dl, [bp + 4]
    .continue:
        mov ah, 0x0e
        ; 0xf0
        mov al, dl
        and al, 0xf0
        shr al, 4
        call to_hex_ascii
        int 0x10  ; BIOS print call
        ; 0x0f
        mov al, dl
        and al, 0x0f
        call to_hex_ascii
        int 0x10  ; BIOS print call

        pop bp
        ret

推荐答案

–弗兰克·科特勒

在NASM手册中， 3.1 NASM源代码行的布局:

这篇关于评论以反斜杠结尾后，NASM/Yasm放弃了致电的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！