我使用open然后open2然后sysopen whithout成功：
sysopen（FH，/ home / Moses / enfr_kiid5 / pipe_CGI_Uniform，O_RDWR）;
sysopen（FH2，/ home / Moses / enfr_kiid5 / pipe_Detoken_CGI，O_RDWR）;
打印FH测试4242测试4242或死错误打印;
不会发生错误，但不起作用：我看不到打印的痕迹，测试语句不写入第一个命名管道，并尝试从第二个块读取进程。 解决方案
$ mkfifo pipe
$ cat pipe&
$ perl -e'打开我的$ f，>，pipe;打印$ ftest\\\
'
test
$ rm pipe
你真的不需要看起来像 sysopen 的东西，命名管道真的应该像普通文件，虽然是半双工。这与你的代码和我的代码有什么区别，值得研究，如果你真的需要这个开放模式。
I have a script which have their input/output plugged to named pipes. I try to write something to the first named pipe and to read the result from the second named pipe but nothing happen.
I used open then open2 then sysopen whithout success :
sysopen(FH, "/home/Moses/enfr_kiid5/pipe_CGI_Uniform", O_RDWR);
sysopen(FH2, "/home/Moses/enfr_kiid5/pipe_Detoken_CGI", O_RDWR);
print FH "test 4242 test 4242" or die "error print";
doesn't made error but didn't work : i can't see trace of the print, the test sentence is not write into the first named pipe and try to read from the second block the process.
Works here.
$ mkfifo pipe
$ cat pipe &
$ perl -e 'open my $f, ">", "pipe"; print $f "test\n"'
test
$ rm pipe
You don't really need fancy sysopen stuff, named pipes are really supposed to behave like regular files, albeit half-duplex. Which happens to be a difference between your code and mine, worth investigating if you really need this opening pattern.
这篇关于如何读/写入Perl中的命名管道？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！