问题描述
我在协议栈的背景 - 3G手机。现在我需要从Android平板电脑传送到服务器,我将code中的interfacet的两侧。
I have a background in protocol stack - for 3g handsets. Now I need to communicate from an Android slate PC to a server, and I will code both sides of the interfacet.
更新:我应该说,从Android的(多)石板本地服务器(多个),然后通过卫星到一个中央主服务器。
Update: I ought to have said, from Android (multiple) slate to local server (multiple), then over satellite to a single central master server.
而现在我认为我可能不会实现,只是这样的设计寻找一些容易的初级工程师来处理
And now I think that I might not be implementing, just designing so looking for something easy for junior engineers to handle
SOAP看起来不错,但他们的任何好的IDE来开发SOAP(或gSOAP的)Android的东西(目前还不能确定哪些O / S服务器将运行;运气好的话我会选择)。
SOAP looks ok, but are their any good IDEs to develop something for SOAP (or GSOAP) for Android (not sure yet which o/s the server will run; with luck I will get to choose).
或者我应该推出自己的,并使用TCP / IP? (我感觉,我不能自圆其说,SOAP可能是更快速地开发和其他人更容易保持)。
Or should I just roll my own and use TCP/IP? (I have feeling, which I can't justify, SOAP might be quicker to develop and easier for others to maintain).
如果我摇我自己的,我可以只使用C或C ++的两端。如果没有肥皂,我可以使用在Android C / C ++(我知道,我可以的,如果它的非SOAP),还是我去与Java?而且,如果我这样做,我应该再与Java走在服务器上,为维护?
If I roll my own, I can just use C or C++ at both ends. IF SOAP, can I use C/C++ on Android (I know that I can if it's non-SOAP), or do I go with Java? And, if I do, should I then go with Java at the server, for maintainability?
最后说明:我想这SOAP将增加开销,我会通过卫星链路,其中每个字节的成本
Final note: I guess that SOAP will add an overhead and I will be doing this over a satellite link, where every byte costs.
有任何影响是否有意义,或者我需要解释它更好?
Does any of that make sense, or do I need to explain it better?
推荐答案
如果你控制两端不要使用肥皂。想想JSON(或JSON-RPC)通过HTTP或使用滚你自己的
Don't use SOAP if you control both ends. Think about JSON (or JSON-RPC) over HTTP or roll your own using prtocol buffers
SOAP是B2B OK(记住这个词,是吗?)的通信,但很沉重和不愉快的处理。它可能是有意义的暴露SOAP接口向外界,尤其是在微软环境中,但它是不理想的内部使用。
SOAP is OK for B2B (remember that term, eh?) communications, but is very heavy and not pleasant to deal with. It might make sense to expose a SOAP interface to the outside world, especially in a Microsoft environment, but it is not ideal for internal use.
更新:
如果使用SOAP两端不必是相同的语言/库。有一些怪癖,我敢肯定,但一般的互操作性,而不是很大,存在。所以,你可以在服务器,或其他方式对设备和C ++上使用Java,无所谓。关于IDE - 用于Java Eclipse有一些比较糟糕,但可用的插件。
现在到卫星链接...你在开玩笑吧?严重的是,取决于你的对象的大小。如果您的请求和响应将是很大的,它可能是可容忍的...也许。但是,如果你打算做了很多短的响应小请求你正在寻找90%的开销。看看这些样品的SOAP消息:http://www.w3schools.com/soap/soap_example.asp
这篇关于肥皂,或不SOAP?就是那个问题的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!