$ _FILES ['size']是伪造的吗？

问题描述

在PHP（ $ _ FILES [...] ['type'] ）中，通过文件上传发送的MIME类型有一个众所周知的警告，是由HTTP客户端发送的，因此可以伪造。

文件名（ $ _ FILES [...] [ 'name'] ），它由HTTP客户端发送，可能包含潜在的危险字符。

然而，我看不到可以伪造文件大小（ $ _ FILES [...] ['size'] ），因为它似乎不是请求有效负载的一部分，至少我在Chrome浏览器中的开发工具中看不到它，有效负载看起来像：

  ------ WebKitFormBoundarytYAQ3ap4cmAB46Ek 
内容处理：表单数据; NAME = 图片;文件名=picture.jpg
内容类型：image / jpeg 
  

和MIME类型在这里是预期的，但没有大小参数的迹象。

不过，我刚刚偶然发现了Symfony的 UploadedFile 的实现，认为文件大小为客户端发起，因此不可信：

$ b

文件大小可以是请求有效载荷的一部分，因此是伪造的，或者它总是从由 $ _ FILES [...] ['tmp_name'] 指向的实际文件推断出来的，因此总是值得信任？

解决方案

正如，我检查了PHP源代码在每次迭代中， wlen 被添加到 total_bytes

TOTAL_BYTES 被分配给 file_size zval

ta rget变量名称 ... [size] 分配给 lbuf

FILE_SIZE在 lbuf ， ... [size] 中包含的名称下注册 li>

所以毫无疑问，唯一分配给 $ _ FILES ['] ['size'] 是写入临时文件的实际字节数，其路径分配给 $ _ FILES [...] ['tmp_name']

就我所见，没有办法伪造大小属性。

There's a well-known caveat about not trusting the MIME type sent via file upload in PHP ($_FILES[...]['type']) as this is sent by the HTTP client and could therefore be forged.

There's a similar caveat for the file name ($_FILES[...]['name']), which is sent by the HTTP client and could contain potentially dangerous characters.

However, I can't see how the file size ($_FILES[...]['size']) could be forged, as it does not seem to be part of the request payload, at least I can't see it in the dev tools in Chrome, where the payload looks like:

------WebKitFormBoundarytYAQ3ap4cmAB46Ek
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="picture"; filename="picture.jpg"
Content-Type: image/jpeg

Original file name and MIME type are here as expected, but no sign of a size parameter.

Still, I've just stumbled upon Symfony's UploadedFile implementation, that considers the file size as client-originated and therefore not trustable:

UploadedFile::getClientSize()

Can the file size be part of the request payload, and therefore be forged, or is it always inferred from the actual file pointed to by $_FILES[...]['tmp_name'], and therefore always trustable?

解决方案

As suggested by @Dagon in the comments, I checked the PHP source in rfc1867.c.

The lines involved in defining the [size] attribute are:

[1042] wlen = write(fd, buff, blen);
       ...
[1056] total_bytes += wlen;
       ....
[1242] ZVAL_LONG(&file_size, total_bytes);
       ...
[1270] snprintf(lbuf, llen, "%s[size]", param);
       ...
[1275] register_http_post_files_variable_ex(lbuf, &file_size, ...

Which I translate as:

• 1042 The temp file is written in wlen size chunks
• 1056 In each iteration, wlen is added to total_bytes
• 1242 total_bytes is assigned to the file_size zval
• 1270 The target variable name ...[size] is assigned to lbuf
• 1275 file_size is registered under the name contained in lbuf, ...[size]

So without doubt, the only variable ever assigned to $_FILES[...]['size'] is the actual number of bytes written to the temporary file whose path is assigned to $_FILES[...]['tmp_name'].

As far as I can see, there is no way to forge the size attribute.

这篇关于$ _FILES ['size']是伪造的吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！