问题描述
我可以解包一个元组.我正在尝试编写一个函数(或宏),它将从类型构造函数 Parameters()
的实例中解压缩其中的一个子集.也就是说,我知道该怎么做:
I can unpack a tuple. I'm trying to write a function (or macro) that would unpack a subset of these from an instance of the type-constructor Parameters()
. That is, I know how to do:
a,b,c = unpack(p::Parameters)
但我想做这样的事情:
b,c = unpack(p::Parameters, b,c)
或者甚至更懒惰:
unpack(p::Parameters, b, c)
这是为了避免这样写:
function unpack_all_oldstyle(p::Parameters)
a=p.a; b=p.b; c=p.c; ... z=p.z;
return a,b,c,...,z
end
我的方法有问题,但希望能解决.
There's something wrong with my approach, but hopefully there is a fix.
如果我的问题的措辞不清楚,我是一个完全无知的人.我在这里阅读了有关解包省略号的信息:how-to-pass-tuple-as-函数参数
In case it wasn't clear from the wording of my question, I'm a total ignoramus. I read about unpacking the ellipsis here: how-to-pass-tuple-as-function-arguments
"module UP tests Unpacking Parameters"
module UP
struct Parameters
a::Int64
b::Int64
c::Int64
end
"this method sets default parameters and returns a tuple of default values"
function Parameters(;
a::Int64 = 3,
b::Int64 = 11,
c::Int64 = 101
)
Parameters(a, b, c)
end
"this function unpacks all parameters"
function unpack_all(p::Parameters)
return p.a, p.b, p.c
end
"this function tests the unpacking function: in the body of the function one can now refer to a rather than p.a : worth the effort if you have dozens of parameters and complicated expressions to compute, e.g. type (-b+sqrt(b^2-4*a*c))/2/a instead of (-p.b+sqrt(p.b^2-4*p.a *p.c))/2/p.a"
function unpack_all_test(p::Parameters)
a, b, c = unpack_all(p)
return a, b, c
end
"""
This function is intended to unpack selected parameters. The first, unnamed argument is the constructor for all parameters. The second argument is a tuple of selected parameters.
"""
function unpack_selected(p::Parameters; x...)
return p.x
end
function unpack_selected_test(p::Parameters; x...)
x = unpack_selected(p, x)
return x
end
export Parameters, unpack_all, unpack_all_test, unpack_selected, unpack_selected_test
end
p = UP.Parameters() # make an instance
UP.unpack_all_test(p)
## (3,11,101) ## Test successful
UP.unpack_selected_test(p, 12)
## 12 ## intended outcome
UP.unpack_selected_test(p, b)
## 11 ## intended outcome
UP.unpack_selected_test(p, c, b, a)
## (101,11,3) ## intended outcome
推荐答案
已经存在一个:参数.jl.
julia> using Parameters
julia> struct Params
a::Int64
b::Int64
c::Int64
end
julia> @unpack a, c = Params(1,2,3)
Params(1,2,3)
julia> a,c
(1,3)
julia> @with_kw struct Params
a::Int64 = 3
b::Int64 = 11
c::Int64 = 101
end
julia> @unpack c,b,a = Params()
Params
a: Int64 3
b: Int64 11
c: Int64 101
julia> c,b,a
(101,11,3)
顺便说一句,您可以通过以下方式修复您的 unpack_selected
:
BTW, you can fix your unpack_selected
by:
unpack_selected(p::Parameters, fields...) = map(x->getfield(p, x), fields)
.
# note that, the selected field names should be Symbol here
julia> unpack_selected(p, :b)
(11,)
julia> unpack_selected(p, :c, :b, :a)
(101,11,3)
这篇关于Julia:在函数中解包参数的最佳实践的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!