本文介绍了当对象在堆栈上声明时,你能保证析构顺序吗?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
我有基于范围控制互斥锁/解锁的代码:
I have code that controls a mutex lock/unlock based on scope:
void PerformLogin()
{
ScopeLock < Lock > LoginLock( &m_LoginLock );
doLoginCommand();
ScopeLock < SharedMemoryBase > MemoryLock( &m_SharedMemory );
doStoreLogin();
...
}
code> MemoryLock 将在 LoginLock
?之前被销毁
Can I guarantee that MemoryLock
will be destructed before LoginLock
?
推荐答案
是的,是的。在任何特定范围中,本地对象以与构造它们相反的顺序被销毁。
Yes, it is. In any particular scope local objects are destroyed in the reverse order that they were constructed.
这篇关于当对象在堆栈上声明时,你能保证析构顺序吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!