我可以通过专业化这两个类合并吗？

问题描述

这是一个类，我写的mock的.NET属性。它似乎做我想要的。但是，不是使用Property1和Property2，我可以写属性，并让它弄清楚我想要的两个类中的哪一个。

Here is a class i wrote to mock .NET properties. It appears to do what i want. However instead of using Property1 and Property2 can i write Property and have it figure out which of the two classes i want?

#include <cstdio>

template <class T>
class Property{
protected:
    Property(const Property&p) {}
    Property() {}
public:
    virtual Property& operator=(const Property& src)=0;
    virtual Property& operator=(const T& src)=0;
    virtual operator T() const=0;
};

template <class T>
class Property1 : public Property<T> {
    T v;
public:
    Property1(const Property1&p) {*this=static_cast<T>(p);}
    //Property1() { printf("ctor %X\n", this);}
    Property1(){}
    Property& operator=(const Property& src) { return*this=static_cast<T>(src); }
    Property& operator=(const T& src) {
        printf("write %X\n", this);
        v = src;
        return *this;
    }
    operator T() const {
        printf("Read %X\n", this);
        return v;
    }
};

template <class T>
class Property2 : public Property<T> {
    typedef T(*Gfn)();
    typedef void(*Sfn)(T);
    Gfn gfn;
    Sfn sfn;
public:
    Property2(const Property2&p) {*this=static_cast<T>(p);}
    //Property2() { printf("ctor %X\n", this);}
    Property2(Gfn gfn_, Sfn sfn_):gfn(gfn_), sfn(sfn_) {}
    Property& operator=(const Property& src) { return*this=static_cast<T>(src); }
    Property& operator=(const T& src) {
        printf("write %X\n", this);
        sfn(src);
        return *this;
    }
    operator T() const {
        printf("Read %X\n", this);
        return gfn();
    }
};

void set(int v) {}
int get() {return 9;}

Property1<int> a, b;
Property2<int> c(get,set), d(get,set);
void fn(Property<int>& v) { v=v=31; }
int main(){
    a=b=5;
    c=d=11;
    a=c=b=d=15;
    fn(a);
    fn(c);
}

推荐答案

$ c> Property 保存和操作一个实现，让 Property1 和 Property2 这样的实现，并确定属性的ctor：

You could make Property hold and operate on an implementation, let Property1 and Property2 be two such implementations, and determine which of the two to create by Property's ctor:

template<typename T>
class PropertyInterface {
public:
    virtual ~PropertyInterface() {}
    virtual T get() const = 0;
    virtual void set(const T&) = 0;
};

template<typename T>
class Property1 : public PropertyInterface<T> {
    T v;
public:
    T get() { return v; }
    void set(const T& value) { v = value; }
};

template<typename T>
class Property2 : public PropertyInterface<T> {
    Gfn g;
    Sfn s;
public:
    Property2(Gfn getter, Sfn setter) : g(getter), s(setter) {}

    T get() { return g(); }
    void set(const T& v) { set(v); }
};

template<typename T>
class Property {
    PropertyInterface<T> impl;
public:
    Property() : impl(new Property1()) {}
    Property(const T& v) : impl(new Property1()) { impl->set(v); }
    Property(Gfn getter, Sfn setter) : impl(new Property2(getter, setter)) {}
    Property(const Property& p) : impl(new Property1()) { impl->set(p.impl->get()); }
    // ...more ctors...

    ~Property() { delete impl; }

    Property& operator=(const Property&) { impl->set(p.impl->get()); return *this; }
    Property& operator=(const T& v) { impl->set(v); return *this; }

    operator T() const { return impl->get(); }
 };

这篇关于我可以通过专业化这两个类合并吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！