ARM 系统调用作为 C++ 模板

本文介绍了ARM 系统调用作为 C++ 模板的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！

问题描述

我需要在我的 newlib 存根中调用一些系统调用，当前的实现使用 C 宏，随着时间的推移，这些宏变得不可读且看起来很糟糕.(而且我讨厌宏...)但是，我使用 C++ 模板的实现仅适用于一个参数:

I need to call some syscalls in my newlib stubs and the current implementation uses C macros which got unreadable and awful looking over time. (And I hate macros...)However, my implementation with C++ templates does only work for one parameter:

template <int nr, typename RETTYPE, typename PARAM1>
    inline RETTYPE syscall(PARAM1 p1)
{
  register PARAM1 r0 asm("r0") = p1;
  asm volatile("svc %[nr]\n"
    : "=r" (r0)
    : [nr] "i" (nr), "r" (r0)
    : "memory", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r12", "lr");
  return (RETTYPE) r0;
}

现在我可以打电话给例如malloc 使用

Now I can call e.g. malloc using

void *ptr = syscall<SYS_MALLOC, void*>(0x1000);

分配 0x1000 字节.

to allocate 0x1000 bytes.

我对四个参数的实现:

template <int nr, typename RETTYPE, typename PARAM1, typename PARAM2, typename PARAM3, typename PARAM4>
    inline RETTYPE syscall(PARAM1 p1, PARAM2 p2, PARAM3 p3, PARAM4 p4)
{
  register PARAM1 r0 asm("r0") = p1;
  register PARAM2 r1 asm("r1") = p2;
  register PARAM3 r2 asm("r2") = p3;
  register PARAM4 r3 asm("r3") = p4;

  asm volatile("svc %[nr]\n"
    : "=r" (r0)
    : [nr] "i" (nr), "r" (r0), "r" (r1), "r" (r2), "r" (r3)
    : "memory", "r12", "lr");

  return (RETTYPE) r0;
}

不起作用，swi"指令的寄存器内容是任意的.不知何故，GCC 不再尊重注册"变量.示例:我在 svc 指令处设置断点并执行

doesn't work, the content of the registers at the "swi" instruction is arbitrary.Somehow GCC doesn't respect the "register" variables anymore.Example: I set a breakpoint at the svc instruction and execute

syscall<FWRITE, int>(ptr, 1, len, f)

但不知何故，r0 设置为 1，r1 设置为 ptr...我也试过在不优化的情况下编译，只是寄存器的顺序发生了一些变化，但它仍然是错误的顺序.我知道我可以执行mov r0, %[param1]"等操作，但这会妨碍优化，从而导致代码变慢.

But somehow r0 is set to 1 and r1 to ptr...I also tried compiling without optimizations, just the order of the registers changed a bit, but it's still the wrong order. I know I could do "mov r0, %[param1]" etc. but that would prevent optimizations and therefore result in slower code.

这是 GCC (4.8.2) 中的错误还是我忽略了什么?

Is it a bug in GCC (4.8.2) or did I overlooking something?

系统调用作为

ARM 系统调用作为 C++ 模板

问题描述

推荐答案