C ++对象构造方法之间的区别

问题描述

C ++中不同的构造语法总是让我有些困惑。在中，建议尝试初始化像这样的字符串

  std :: string foo {'\0'}; 
  

这有效并产生预期的结果：长度为1的字符串，仅包含空字符。在测试代​​码时，我不小心输入了

  std :: string foo（'\0'）; 
  

这可以很好地编译（即使使用 -Wall ），但在运行时终止，

 终止是在抛出'std :: logic_error'
实例后调用的what（）：basic_string :: _ M_construct null无效
中止（转储）
  

现在，据我所知， c $ c> std :: string ，它使用单个字符作为参数，当我尝试间接传递字符时，这一假设得到了进一步的证实。

  char b ='\0'; 
 std :: string a（b）; 
  

这会产生一个很长的编译错误。

  std :: string a（’z’）也是如此； 
  

所以我的问题是：什么允许 std :: string a（'＼ ＼0'）; 进行编译，它与 std :: string a {'\0'}; 有何不同？

---

解决方案

字符'\0'可隐式转换为 0 的整数值，从而表示实现定义的空指针常量。这：

  std :: string foo（’\0’）; 
  

调用构造函数重载，接受类型为 const char * 作为参数，并导致未定义的行为。
等效于传递 0 或 NULL ：

  std :: string foo（0）; // UB 
 std :: string bar（NULL）; // UB 
  

表示第四和第五个构造函数重载状态：

第二条语句：

  std :: string foo {'\0'}; // OK 
  

调用接受 std :: initializer_list< char> 作为参数，不会导致UB。

您可以调用构造函数重载，接受 count 个 char s号：

  std :: string s（1，'\0'）; 
  

The different construction syntaxes in C++ have always confused me a bit. In another question, it was suggested to try initializing a string like so

std::string foo{ '\0' };

This works and produces the intended result: a string of length 1 containing only the null character. In testing the code, I accidentally typed

std::string foo('\0');

This compiles fine (no warnings even with -Wall), but terminates at runtime with

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error'
  what():  basic_string::_M_construct null not valid
Aborted (core dumped)

Now, as far as I can tell, there is no constructor for std::string which takes a single character as an argument, and this hypothesis is further confirmed when I attempt to pass the character indirectly.

char b = '\0';
std::string a(b);

This produces a nice, lengthy compile error. As does this

std::string a('z');

So my question is: what allows std::string a('\0'); to compile, and what makes it different from std::string a{ '\0' };?

---

解决方案

Character '\0' is implicitly convertible to integer value of 0 thus representing implementation-defined null pointer constant. This:

std::string foo('\0');

calls a constructor overload accepting pointer of type const char* as a parameter and results in undefined behavior. It is equivalent to passing 0 or NULL:

std::string foo(0); // UB
std::string bar(NULL); // UB

The reference for the 4th and 5th constructor overloads states:

The second statement:

std::string foo{'\0'}; // OK

calls a constructor accepting std::initializer_list<char> as a parameter and does not cause UB.

You could call the constructor overload accepting count number of chars instead:

std::string s(1, '\0');

这篇关于C ++对象构造方法之间的区别的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！