问题描述
遵循极具启发性的问题 @TravisBrown 关于使用 shapeless 的 ADT 枚举，我留下以下代码片段:
Following the awesomely enlightening question by @TravisBrown concerning the enumeration of ADTs using shapeless, I am left with the following code snippet:
implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]].values
我想将它封装在一个方法中，这样我就不必在每次调用后使用 .values (这样对我来说似乎是一个更清晰的 API).但是我似乎做对了.每当我尝试封装 implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]] 时，我都会收到隐式解析错误.
I would like to encapsulate this within a method so that I don't have to .values after each invocation (It seems a cleaner API to me, that way). But I can't seem to get it right. Whenever I try to encapsulate the implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]] I get implicit resolution errors.
我尝试过的对我来说最有意义的方法是，例如:
What I had tried, that made most sense to me, was, for example:
def imply[T](implicit ev: T):Set[T] = implicitly[EnumerableAdt[T]].values
当然没有 ev 对我来说更没有意义.
certainly without the ev made even less sense to me.
我不是类型级编程的专家.
I am no expert in type level programming.
推荐答案
如果看implicitly[X]，你可以看到它需要一个 X 在范围内.在您的示例中，您在范围内具有隐式 ev: T，这不足以调用 implicitly[EnumerableAdt[T]]！请尝试以下定义:
If you look at the definition of implicitly[X], you can see that is requires an implicit argument of type X in scope. In your example, you have implicit ev: T in scope, which is not enough to call implicitly[EnumerableAdt[T]]! Try the following definition instead:
def imply[T](implicit ev: EnumerableAdt[T]):Set[T] = ev.values
这篇关于隐式参数:如何在函数签名中编码?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！