问题描述
今天两次回复粗鲁的信息（曾经在这里，曾经在SpamBayes
列表中），其作者不配得到我的时间的好处。在这两种情况下，
其他人正确地回应了一些少量的返回毒液
（但仍提供了有用的回复）。
我建议只有一个正确的这种消息的回应方式（如果你要回复的话）。那就是专注于他们信息的实质内容，并完全忽略了怨恨。我已经为Musi-Cal担任了超过十年的首席技术人员（包括用户支持），并为Mojam工作了大约7年的b $ b。在那段时间里，我收到了很多
感谢人们为这些网站提供的服务。虽然每隔一段时间，但是我会得到一条消息，一个人只要是一个混蛋，或者是拥有所有糟糕日子的母亲。我找到了那里
没有那么令人满意，因为礼貌地回应这些消息，然后
让他们的作者后来几乎爬回去为
如此不合时宜。
只是想一想......
Skip
Twice today I responded to rude messages (once here, once on the SpamBayes
list) whose authors didn''t deserve the benefit of my time. In both cases,
other people rightfully responded with some small amount of return venom
(but provided useful responses nonetheless).
Let me suggest that there is only one "correct" way to respond (if you are
going to respond at all) to such messages. That''s to focus on the substance
of their message and completely ignore the rancor. I''ve been the chief
technical guy (including user support) for Musi-Cal for over ten years and
for Mojam for about seven years. During that time I''ve received lots of
thanks from people for the service those sites provide. Every once in
awhile though, I get a message out of the blue from someone who is either
simply an asshole or is having the mother of all bad days. I''ve found there
is nothing so satisfying as responding politely to such messages and then to
have their authors come virtually crawling back later with an apology for
having been so out-of-line.
Just a thought...
Skip
推荐答案
这就是我的工作。我有时会想要说些什么，所以我写下了我的咆哮。一旦我从我的系统中删除它，我意识到它没有在讨论中添加任何内容，并将其删除。我脑子里想要咆哮的部分很高兴，因为它得到了发言权，其余的b $ b b世界更乐于不读它。 br />
我强烈建议人们试试。它创造奇迹。
That''s what I do. I sometimes have something I want to say, so I write
my rant. Once I get it out of my system, I realize that it isn''t adding
anything to the discussion, and delete it. The part of my brain that
wants to rant is happy because it got its say in, and the rest of the
world is happier for not having to read it.
I highly recommend that people try it. It works wonders.
这篇关于用火扑灭火灾......的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！