问题描述
编辑：看来，这可能是与Chrome相关的V43，我降级为V42，一切工作正常。
It seems that this could be related to Chrome v43, I downgraded to v42 and everything works fine.
编辑：我已经提交了对角的Github上回购。
I've submitted an issue on the Angular's Github repo.
看来这个错误被抛出由返回logFn.apply（控制台，参数）; 行 12221 在angular.js源
It seems that the error gets thrown byreturn logFn.apply(console, args); line 12221 in angular.js source.
什么任何提示现在怎么办？
Any tips on what to do now?
我想我的应用程序从AngularJS V1.2迁移到V1.3或者V1.4或但我得到类型错误：非法调用在Chrome（试图取胜，OSX和Ubuntu）。
I'm trying to migrate my app from AngularJS v1.2 to either v1.3 or v1.4 but I'm getting TypeError: Illegal invocation on Chrome (tried win, osx and ubuntu).
堆栈跟踪是不是真的帮助：
The stack trace isn't really helping:
TypeError: Illegal invocation
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at Scope.$get.Scope.$digest (angular.js:15550)
at Scope.$get.Scope.$apply (angular.js:15824)
at done (angular.js:10263)
at completeRequest (angular.js:10435)
at XMLHttpRequest.requestLoaded (angular.js:10376)
所以，这似乎是与AJAX请求，但我也越来越：
So this seems something to do with AJAX requests, but I'm also getting:
TypeError: Illegal invocation
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at equals (angular.js:1034)
at Scope.$get.Scope.$digest (angular.js:15550)
at Scope.$get.Scope.$apply (angular.js:15824)
at tick (angular.js:10983)
我用 $间隔更新模型类（这是一个工厂，并通过设置反映的意见 $ scope.client 这一类）：
I'm using $interval to update a model class (which is a factory and reflected in the views through setting the $scope.client to this class):
var runTimer = function () {
self.timeOnline = time(self.timeSoFar);
self.timeSoFar = Date.now() / 1000 - self.alarmTriggeredTime;
};
$interval(runTimer, 1000);
我觉得有与 $问题消化/ $适用。我花了几个小时的调试这一点，但仍然没有得到对所发生的事情的线索。
I think there's an issue with $digest/$apply. I've spent hours debugging this, but still haven't got a clue on what's happening.
任何指针为进一步调试是非常AP preciated。
Any pointers into further debugging is much appreciated.
推荐答案
angular-问题中，<一个href=\"https://$c$c.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=167911&q=illegal%20invocation&colspec=ID%20Pri%20M%20Week%20ReleaseBlock%20Cr%20Status%20Owner%20Summary%20OS%20Modified\"相对=nofollow>铬错误的会的显示的好像每个人（当然，主要是每个人）是投掷他们的手在空中。也许我是评判/平原说，错了。
Between the angular-issue, the chromium-bug, the webkit-bug and the (I dont even know what this is) something-Webkit-issue it would appear as if everyone (well, mostly everyone) is throwing their hands in the air. Perhaps I'm being judgemental/plain wrong in saying that.
反正我是没能获得 window.history.back 情况下登录而不引起非法调用但我能做到 console.log.call（窗口，'X'）通过以下片段：
Anyway, I wasn't able to get the window.history.back case to log without causing an Illegal Invocation but I was able to do console.log.call(window, 'x') with the following 'snippet:'
(function() { console.log = console.log.bind(console); }());
（取直客的最后一个环节出现，感谢布赖恩！的）
就掴了这一点在你的HTML文档/无论你想（我猜）的顶部。
Just slap that out in the top of your HTML document/wherever you want (I guess).
的我的超级好奇，会发生什么，如果你要运行@Ignas。的我似乎无法复制你是presenting的问题一个工厂结合 $范围和你的运行 $间隔。
I'm super curious as to what would happen if you were to run that @Ignas. I cannot seem to replicate the issue you are presenting with a Factory binding to $scope and running that $interval of yours.
很想看看它是否持有任何影响（虽然不是功能之一，但越是这样一个的装饰的之一，我想）。
Would love to see if it holds any effect (albeit, not a functional one but more so a decorative one, I suppose).
旁注;的我是我是新手，我只是用我的同行获悉，console.log.call（窗口）应确实引发非法调用错误，所以这是一个非问题afaic。还是好奇的是，这是否会举行内部角上的 logFn 的效果。的
Sidenote; Me being the newbie I am, I was just informed by my peers that console.log.call(window) shall indeed throw an Illegal Invocation error, so that is a non-issue afaic. Still curious as to if this would hold effect on the logFn inside Angular.
这篇关于＆QUOT;类型错误：非法调用＆QUOT;试图从V1.2升级的时候的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！