问题描述
我认为这很简单:
if(typeof(Array.push) == 'undefined'){
//not defined, prototype a version of the push method
// Firefox never gets here, but IE/Safari/Chrome/etc. do, even though
// the Array object has a push method!
}
它在Firefox, 中工作正常,但在IE,Chrome,Safari,Opera 中却不能,它们将本地Array对象的所有属性/方法都返回为"undefined" '使用此测试.
And it does work fine in Firefox, but not in IE, Chrome, Safari, Opera, they return all properties/methods of the native Array object as 'undefined' using this test.
.hasOwnProperty(prop)方法仅适用于实例...因此不起作用,但是通过反复试验,我注意到这是可行的.
The .hasOwnProperty( prop ) method only works on instances... so it doesn't work, but by trial and error I noticed that this works.
//this works in Firefox/IE(6,7,8)/Chrome/Safari/Opera
if(typeof(Array().push) == 'undefined'){
//not defined, prototype a version of the push method
}
使用此语法确定本机对象/〜"JavaScript类"〜中是否存在属性/方法是否存在问题,或者有更好的方法吗?
Is there anything wrong with using this syntax to determine if a property/method exists on a Native Object / ~"JavaScript Class"~, or is there a better way to do this?
推荐答案
首先,typeof是运算符,而不是函数,因此不需要括号.其次,访问对象的原型.
First of all, typeof is an operator, not a function, so you don't need the parentheses. Secondly, access the object's prototype.
alert( typeof Array.prototype.push );
alert( typeof Array.prototype.foo );
执行typeof Array.push
时,您正在测试Array对象本身是否具有push方法,而不是在Array实例具有push方法时进行测试.
When you execute typeof Array.push
you are testing if the Array object itself has a push method, not if instances of Array have a push method.
这篇关于如何确定本机JavaScript对象是否具有属性/方法?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!