问题描述
我是Web开发的初学者，最近我开始使用Twitter Bootstrap，我知道它使用 Glyphicons 已经知道如何使用.但是我还遇到了 Font Awesome ，它说它是为Bootstrap构建的.
I am a beginner in web development and I recently started working with Twitter Bootstrap, I know it uses Glyphicons which I already know how to use. But I also came across Font Awesome which says that it is built for Bootstrap.
两者之间有什么区别?我的意思是一个可以替代另一个吗?还是应该在不同的地方使用它们?
What are the differences between the two? I mean is one an alternative for the other? Or should you use them in different places?
推荐答案
在Bootstrap 2.xx中 Glyphyicons 是图像格式的，因此您不能增加大小，轻松更改颜色，背景色等.但是，令人敬畏的字体为您提供了可扩展的矢量图标，这些图标可以立即进行自定义-大小，颜色，阴影以及使用CSS的强大功能可以完成的任何事情.
In Bootstrap 2.x.x Glyphyicons were in image format, hence you can't increase the size, change the color, background-color, etc easily. However, font-awesome gives you scalable vector icons that can instantly be customized — size, color, drop-shadow, and anything that can be done with the power of CSS.
Font-awesome确实是Glyphyicons的替代品，它可以随时使用新图标进行更新. Fat和Mdo计划将Font-awesome集成到Bootstrap版本3中，以替代Glyphyicons.
Font-awesome is really an alternative for Glyphyicons which is getting updated time-to-time with new icons. Fat and Mdo are planning to integrate Font-awesome in bootstrap version 3 as a replacement for Glyphyicons.
我的建议是您将Bootstrap与font-awesome一起使用.首先包含bootstrap css，然后包括Font-awesome css，以便将Glyphyicons替换为font-awesome.
My suggestion is you use bootstrap with font-awesome. First include bootstrap css and then Font-awesome css, so that the Glyphyicons will be override by font-awesome.
更新
在 bootstrap版本3.x.x 中，glyphicons变为字体格式，即使以12px字体大小也可以很好地呈现.如果您使用的是最新版的fontawesome(即4.01)，则可以同时使用两个glyphicons和fontawesome.
In bootstrap version 3.x.x glyphicons become font format, which will render nicely even in 12px font-size. If you're using the latest version of fontawesome, i.e. 4.01, you can use both glyphicons with fontawesome.
这篇关于Twitter Bootstrap中的Font Awesome vs Glyphicons的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！