错误的SHA1从PHP和放大器;根据Amazon S3的CF

本文介绍了错误的SHA1从PHP和放大器;根据Amazon S3的CF的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！

问题描述

亚马逊始终产生不同的散列比PHP或CF，这会导致持久性SignatureDoesNotMatch错误。

Amazon consistently generates a different hash than PHP or CF, which causes a persistent "SignatureDoesNotMatch" error.

根据到文档，GET请求[没有休息头]签署如下：

According to the docs, GET requests [without REST headers] are signed as follows:

Signature = URL-Encode( Base64( HMAC-SHA1( SecretAccessKey, UTF-8-Encoding-Of( StringToSign ) ) ) );

StringToSign = HTTP-VERB + "\n" +
    Content-MD5 + "\n" +
    Content-Type + "\n" +
    Expires + "\n" +
    CanonicalizedAmzHeaders +
    CanonicalizedResource;

该示例数据：

The example data:

SecretAccessKey： wJalrXUtnFEMI / K7MDENG / bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY
内容-MD5和内容类型：（可选 - 跳过）
CanonicalizedAmzHeaders：（无标题 - 跳过）
资源：johnsmith.s3.amazonaws.com/photos/puppy.jpg
CanonicalizedResource： /johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg

SecretAccessKey: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY
Content-MD5 and Content-Type: (optional - skipped)
CanonicalizedAmzHeaders: (no headers - skipped)
Resource: johnsmith.s3.amazonaws.com/photos/puppy.jpg
CanonicalizedResource: /johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg

提供了两个例子：

过期 1175139620 ;签名： rucSbH0yNEcP9oM2XNlouVI3BH4％3D
过期 1141889120 ;签名： vjbyPxybdZaNmGa％2ByT272YEAiv4％3D

Expires 1175139620; Signature: rucSbH0yNEcP9oM2XNlouVI3BH4%3D
Expires 1141889120; Signature: vjbyPxybdZaNmGa%2ByT272YEAiv4%3D

要（从这里 CFHMAC）重建这样的：

To recreate this (CFHMAC from here):

// PHP
$expires = 1175139620;
$SecretAccessKey = "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY";
$StringToSign = "GET\n\n\n$expires\n/johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg";
$signature = urlencode( base64_encode( hash_hmac('sha1',  utf8_encode($StringToSign), $SecretAccessKey, true)));

// ColdFusion
<cfset LF = chr(10)>
<cfset expires = 1141889120>
<cfset SecretAccessKey = "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY">
<cfset StringToSign = "GET#LF##LF##LF##expires##LF#/johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg">
<cfset signature = URLEncodedFormat( CFHMAC(StringToSign, SecretAccessKey))>

除返回两种语言的$签名是：

EXCEPT that $signature as returned by both languages is:

过期 1175139620 ;签名： NpgCjnDzrM％2BWFzoENXmpNDUsSn8％3D
过期 1141889120 ;签名： fScKGHCDI0NY5E7CYp9Vc8VKMbY％3D

Expires 1175139620; Signature: NpgCjnDzrM%2BWFzoENXmpNDUsSn8%3D
Expires 1141889120; Signature: fScKGHCDI0NY5E7CYp9Vc8VKMbY%3D

我们一直在谨慎，其他人已经提到的这些陷阱的：

We have been careful of these gotchas that others have mentioned:

hash_mac有第三个参数，原料，必须设置为true。
的stringToSign在S3伪code的顺序和重点应该是相反的。
在整个stringToSign必须在同一行（以免产生额外的换行符）。

编辑：更新的基础上Leigh的答案CF code中的新行;现在CF相匹配的PHP。

Updated the newlines in the CF code based on Leigh's answer; now the CF matches the PHP.

我明明做错事，但无法弄清。
[我听说它打趣说，亚马逊S3将被称为CSS - ！复杂的存储服务，但这个名字已经取]

I am obviously doing something wrong, but can't figure out what.
[I have heard it quipped that Amazon S3 would have been called CSS - "complicated storage service", but the name was already taken!]

帮助，请！

推荐答案

（可能也张贴这一点，因为我已经写了起来..：）

(May as well post this since I had already written it up .. :)

有两个问题，我可以看到

Two problems I can see

的日期需要格式化某个特定的方式
您需要使用 LF ，而不是文字\ N

The date needs to be formatted a specific way
You need to use a LF rather than a literal "\n"

结果如下匹配的验证例子即 bWq2s1WEIj + Ydj0vQ697zp + IXMU = 。注：我使用 href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/2960258/104223">的HMACSHA1功能，但改变了它使用的GetBytes（UTF-8 ）

The result below matches that in Authentication Examples ie bWq2s1WEIj+Ydj0vQ697zp+IXMU=. Note: I used the hmacSHA1 function from here, but changed it use getBytes("UTF-8)

code：

    <cfset newLine = chr(10)>
    <cfset secretAccessKey = "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY">
    <cfset stringToSign = "GET#newLine##newLine##newLine#Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:36:42 +0000#newLine#/johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg">
    <cfset signature = hmacSHA1(secretAccessKey, stringToSign)>
    <cfset finalSignature = URLEncodedFormat(binaryEncode(signature, "base64"))>
    <cfoutput>finalSignature = #finalSignature#</cfoutput>

* *编辑1：

了什么事。最重要的是在该网页匹配起来的例子。但是， Rest认证示例3：查询字符串认证范例这里显示不同的密钥和字符串产生的签名 vjbyPxybdZaNmGa％2ByT272YEAiv4％3D 。如果你使用这些值在CF您的不的得到相同的签名。所以我想知道如果它可能只是一个文档的错误？

Something is fishy. Most all of the examples on that page match up. But REST Authentication Example 3: Query String Authentication Example here shows a different key and string that produce the signature vjbyPxybdZaNmGa%2ByT272YEAiv4%3D. If you use those values in CF you do get the same signature. So I am wondering if it might just be a documentation error?

     <cfset secretAccessKey = "OtxrzxIsfpFjA7SwPzILwy8Bw21TLhquhboDYROV">
     <cfset stringToSign = "GET#newLine##newLine##newLine#1141889120#newLine#/quotes/nelson">

** 修改2：

** EDIT 2:

我是pretty的确保REST的例子是错误的。一个搜索打开了包含另一个示例键此链接。如果替换，在CF code，签名是你所期望的： rucSbH0yNEcP9oM2XNlouVI3BH4％3D 。

I am pretty sure the REST examples are wrong. A search turned up this link containing yet another sample key. If you substitute that in the CF code, the signature is what you expected: rucSbH0yNEcP9oM2XNlouVI3BH4%3D.

    <cfset secretAccessKey = "uV3F3YluFJax1cknvbcGwgjvx4QpvB+leU8dUj2o">
    <cfset stringToSign = "GET#newLine##newLine##newLine#1175139620#newLine#/johnsmith/photos/puppy.jpg">

这篇关于错误的SHA1从PHP和放大器;根据Amazon S3的CF的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！