方法级联如何在飞镖中正常工作?

问题描述

如飞镖文章所述:

所以我认为这会起作用:

So I assumed that this would work:

myList..clear().addAll(otherList);

这给了我我无法在null上调用.addAll的错误.

which gave me the error that I can't call .addAll on null.

因此，显然.在..之前，因此.addAll已在.clear()的结果上调用.

So apparently . precedes .. so that .addAll has been invoked on the result of .clear().

我现在认为我有两种写法:

I figure now that I have two possibilities to write this:

1. myList..clear()..addAll(otherList);
2. (myList..clear()).addAll(otherList);(如果我想获得.addAll()的结果.

1. myList..clear()..addAll(otherList);
2. (myList..clear()).addAll(otherList); (If I wanted to get the result of .addAll().

这是正确的吗?如果是，为什么决定赋予.优先权?似乎很违反直觉.是否要避免这样的语法:myList(..clear().useResultOfClear()).addAll(otherList);?

Is this correct? If yes, why the decision to give . precedence? It seems very counterintuitive. Is it to avoid syntax like this: myList(..clear().useResultOfClear()).addAll(otherList);?

推荐答案

您可以阅读Gilad Bracha的文章: Dart中的方法级联.在其末尾，您将看到许多示例.

You can read the article from Gilad Bracha : Method Cascades in Dart. At its ends, you will see many examples.

另请参见有关拉瑟尼尔森的答案，运算符优先级:

基本上，a..b().c()与(t){t.b().c(); return t;}(a)

这篇关于方法级联如何在飞镖中正常工作?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！