有没有办法限制不受信任的容器调度程序？

本文介绍了有没有办法限制不受信任的容器调度程序？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述 29岁程序员，3月因学历无情被辞！ 我有一个想要授予特权的应用程序，可以启动短期任务并将其作为Docker容器进行调度。我当时只是想通过 docker run 来做到这一点。I have an application which I'd like to give the privilege to launch short-lived tasks and schedule these as docker containers. I was thinking of doing this simply via docker run.我想使攻击面小到可能的话，我认为该应用程序不受信任。这样，它可以针对预定义的Docker API端点运行任意 docker run 命令（如果代码库包含错误或容器被盗，输入被不正确地转义了，等等）。As I want to make the attack surface as small as possible, I treat the application as untrusted. As such it can potentially run arbitrary docker run commands (if the codebase contained bug or the container was compromised, input was improperly escaped somewhere etc.) against a predefined docker API endpoint.这就是为什么我要以某些方式限制该应用程序（实际上是调度程序）的原因：This is why I'd like to restrict that application (effectively a scheduler) in some ways: 防止-特权使用 强制-只读标志 强制执行内存操作； CPU限制prevent --privileged useenforce --read-only flagenforce memory & CPU limits我查看了几个选项： selinux selinux策略需要在主机级别设置，然后在内部传播通过守护程序级别上的-启用了selinux的标志来打开容器。但是，调度程序仍然可以通过 run --privileged 来覆盖此设置。selinuxthe selinux policies would need to be set on the host level and then propagated inside the containers via --selinux-enabled flag on the daemon level. The scheduler can however override this anyway via run --privileged. 这些仅在启动容器时应用（seccomp标志可用于 docker run ）these are only applied at a time of launching the container (seccomp flags are available for docker run) 可以（再次）通过-privilegedthis can (again) be overriden on the scheduler level via --privileged 此标志实际上只有一个选项（ native.cgroupdriver ）only a single option is actually available for this flag (native.cgroupdriver)默认情况下，Docker被设计为信任容器调度程序。 有人知道这是否是一项设计决定吗？It seems that Docker is designed to trust container schedulers by default.Does anyone know if this is a design decision?在我错过了最新的Docker版本的情况下，还有其他可用的解决方案吗？Is there any other possible solution available w/ current latest Docker version that I missed?我还查看了Kubernetes及其限制范围& 资源配额，可以应用于K8S命名空间，看起来很有趣，假设有一种方法可以强制某些调度程序仅使用某些命名空间。I also looked at Kubernetes and its Limit Ranges & Resource Quotas which can be applied to K8S namespaces, which looked interesting, assuming there's a way to enforce certain schedulers to only use certain namespaces. This would however increase the scope of this problem to operating K8S cluster.推荐答案在unix平台上运行docker应该与 nice 还是这样，我想首先要仔细一点，它看起来像您需要一些 -cpuset-cpus = 0,1running docker on a unix platform should be compatible with nice Or so I would think at first looking a little more closely it looks like you need somethign like -cpuset-cpus="0,1"从第二个链接-cpu-配额看起来与--cpuset-cpus相似...为一个进程分配一个或几个核心，只是时间管理而不是处理器数量管理。 这篇关于有没有办法限制不受信任的容器调度程序？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！ 上岸，阿里云！