问题描述
我知道有些语言对单词的强调与英语不同，例如通过改变词尾而不是用语调来强调单词.
I know some languages emphasise words differently to English, e.g. via changing word endings rather than stressing words with inflection of the voice.
如果您正在本地化一个网站，您会相信 和 标签(及其位置)在其他网站中具有相同的含义吗?语言——你会保持这种强调，与你的翻译核实还是忽略它们?
If you are localising a site, would you trust that <strong> and <em> tags (and their placement) will have the same meaning in other languages — would you maintain this emphasis, check with your translator or leave them out?
我想知道这是如何将(请原谅双关语)转化为网络语义的?— Strong 和 em 标签带有在 SEO、屏幕阅读器等中使用的语义.那么它们应该留在原地以免丢失，还是丢弃以更好地符合目标语言?
What I'm wondering is how this translates (excuse the pun) into the semantics of the web? — Strong and em tags carry semantic meaning that is used within SEO, screen-readers etc. So should they be left in place so this isn't lost, or dropped to better conform with the target language?
推荐答案
标记是为了传达一个整体的意义，只要传达了意义，你的标记就成功了.因此，在文本中传达强调强调的语言中，使用标签来表示强调是多余的和可选的.
Mark-up is there to convey meaning a whole, and so long as the meaning is conveyed, you have succeeded in your mark-up. So in a language where stress emphasis is conveyed in the text, using tags to signal the emphasis is redundant and optional.
内联级标记比块级标记更重要，在不同的语言中可能需要完全不同.在一个好的翻译中，文本应该用每种语言从头开始标记.
Inline level markup, much more so than block level markup, may need to be radically different in different languages. In a good translation, the text should be marked up from scratch in each language.
这篇关于在本地化字符串时使用 strong/em 标签的正确方法是什么?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！