当使用"="定义对象时，复制构造函数不起作用.运算符(复制初始化)?

问题描述

代码:

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class String
{

	char name[256];
public:

	String(char* str)
	{
		cout<<"Constructor" << endl;
		strcpy(name,str);
	}

	String(String &s)
	{
		cout<< "Copy Constructor"<< endl;
		strcpy(name,s.name);
	}

	String()
	{
		cout<<"Default Constructor"<<endl;
	}

	~String(){}

	String& operator=(const String&s)
	{
		strcpy(name,s.name);
		cout<<"Assign Operator"<<endl;
		return *this;
	}


	void display()
	{
		cout << "The String is:" << name << endl;
	}
};


int main()
{
	String mystr1 = "a";//Why does it only print "Constructor"?
	String mystr2;
	mystr2 = "aa";
	String mystr3("aaa");//Here just invoke String::String(char *str).
	return 0;
}

为什么在定义"mystr1"时不调用String :: String(String& s)?

Why don''t invoke String::String(String &s) while defining "mystr1" ? How compiler deals with the mystr1 definition?

推荐答案

String mystr2;
mystr2 = mystr1;
String mystr3(mystr2);

String& operator=(const char* s)
{
    ASSERT(s);
    strncpy(name, s, 256);
    name[255] = '\0';
    cout<<"char* assign Operator"<<endl;
    return *this;
    }

CPallini是正确的，我的回答是错误的.

CPallini is right and my answer is wrong.

String mystr1 = "a";//Why does it only print "Constructor"?

is as good as (if you are using non explicit constructor taking char*)

String mystr1("a");//Why does it only print "Constructor"?

 use explicit keyword and then try -


....
explicit String(char* str)
	{
		cout<<"Constructor" << endl;
		strcpy(name,str);
	}
....
String mystr1 = "a";// This won't compile now
                   // and no implicit conversions will take place. 

此链接也将提供帮助.

This link will also help.

这篇关于当使用"="定义对象时，复制构造函数不起作用.运算符(复制初始化)?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！