问题描述
想象一下,我们下面有familytree
模块(简单示例):
Imagine we have the familytree
module below (simple example) :
:- module(familytree, [
father/2,
mother/2,
%[...]
]).
father(X,Y) :- male(X),parent(X,Y).
father(unknown, _) :- male(unknown).
mother(X,Y) :- female(X),parent(X,Y).
mother(unknown, _) :- female(unknown).
sister(X,Y) :- female(X),parent(Z,X),parent(Z,Y), X \= Y.
%[... other relation predicates ... ]
我想将此模块谓词与不同的"dbs"一起使用,例如:
I want to use this module predicates with different "dbs", for examples with :
:- module(familytree_xyz, []).
male(james).
male(fred).
male(mike).
female(betty).
female(sandra).
parent(james, fred).
parent(betty, fred).
或:
:- module(familytree_simpson, []).
male(homer).
male(bart).
female(marge).
female(lisa).
parent(homer, bart).
%[...]
我需要:
I need :
- 在运行时而不是在编译时选择数据库.
- 同时使用一个或多个数据库.
- 扩展db,例如.与其他Simpson家族成员一起扩展"familytree_simpson"数据库模块创建一个"familytree_simpson_extended"数据库模块(请参见上面的示例)
- 符合 swi-prolog .
- to choose db on runtime, not on compilation.
- to use one or more dbs in same time.
- to extend db, for eg. create a "familytree_simpson_extended" db module with other Simpson family members extending "familytree_simpson" db module (see above example)
- to be swi-prolog compliant.
目前,我尝试使用term_expansion/2
,discontiguous/1
,multifile/1
,dynamic/1
和thread_local/1
指令,但是:
For now, I tried to play with term_expansion/2
, discontiguous/1
, multifile/1
, dynamic/1
and thread_local/1
directives, but :
-
term_expansion/2
似乎仅在编译时可用, -
discontiguous/1
,multifile/1
,未改编, 前言中的 - 动态数据库被视为"邪恶"实践,但是许多软件包和库都使用它(例如,
pengines
,broadcast
模块,http
lib). -
thread_local/1
的文档不多,并且似乎在Prolog源代码(swi-prolog)中不经常使用.
term_expansion/2
seems only usable on compile time,discontiguous/1
,multifile/1
, not adapted,- dynamic dbs in prolog are seen as an "Evil" practice, however lot of packages and libraries use its (
pengines
,broadcast
module,http
lib, for examples). thread_local/1
is not very documented and seems not often used in prolog source code (swi-prolog).
在使用动态谓词时,我将以前的代码更新如下:
With playing with dynamic predicate, I update previous code as follow :
%familytree.pl
:- module(familytree, [
familytree_cleanup_db/0,
familytree_use_db/1,
%[... previous declarations ...]
]).
dynamic male/1, female/1, parent/2.
familytree_cleanup_db :-
retractall(male/1),
retractall(female/1),
retractall(parent/2).
familytree_use_db(ModuleName) :-
assert(male(X) :- ModuleName:male(X)),
assert(female(X) :- ModuleName:female(X)),
assert(parent(X,Y) :- ModuleName:parent(X,Y)).
%[... previous predicates ...]
然后:
%main.pl
% use familytree tool predicates
:- use_module(familytree).
%load all familytree dbs at compile time.
:- use_module(familytree_xyz).
:- use_module(familytree_simpson).
:- use_module(familytree_simpson_extended).
main_xyz:-
familytree_cleanup_db,
familytree_use_db(familytree_xyz),
process.
main_simpson_all :-
familytree_cleanup_db,
familytree_use_db(familytree_simpson),
familytree_use_db(familytree_simpson_extended),
process.
process :-
findall(X, father(X,_), Xs),
write(Xs).
也可以按以下方式与其他数据库一起使用:
And it's ok to use with different db as follow :
?- main_simpson_all.
[homer,homer,abraham]
true.
?- main_xyz.
[james]
true.
因此,对于帖子的篇幅,我们深表歉意.问题:
-
此动态谓词解决方案应考虑哪些标准,利弊?这是一个好的解决方案吗?
What are the criteria, pros/cons to consider with this dynamic predicates solution ? is it a good solution ?
采用干净/健壮的代码来实现序言的最佳实践/特定设计模式是什么?**
What are the best practice / specific design pattern for prolog to do that in a clean / robust code ?**
使用thread_local/1
代替dynamic/1
并封装对新线程的调用以避免清理数据库的情况如何?
What's about using thread_local/1
instead dynamic/1
and encapsulate call to new thread to avoid cleanup db?
推荐答案
扩展我的评论,Logtalk解决方案非常简单.首先,使用家庭关系谓词定义一个根对象:
Expanding my comment, the Logtalk solution is straightforward. First, define a root object with the family relations predicate:
:- object(familytree).
:- public([
father/2, mother/2,
sister/2, brother/2
]).
:- public([
parent/2,
male/1, female/1
]).
father(Father, Child) :-
::male(Father),
::parent(Father, Child).
mother(Mother, Child) :-
::female(Mother),
::parent(Mother, Child).
sister(Sister, Child) :-
::female(Sister),
::parent(Parent, Sister),
::parent(Parent, Child),
Sister \== Child.
brother(Brother, Child) :-
::male(Brother),
::parent(Parent, Brother),
::parent(Parent, Child),
Brother \== Child.
:- end_object.
请注意,对male/1
,female/1
和parent/2
的定义的查找始于 self ,即在对象数据库中,该数据库将接收有关家庭关系.从您的示例代码派生的示例将是:
Note that the lookup of the definitions of the male/1
, female/1
, and parent/2
starts in self, i.e. in the object, the database, that will receive the queries about the family relations. An example, derived from your sample code would be:
:- object(simpsons,
extends(familytree)).
male(homer).
male(bart).
female(marge).
female(lisa).
parent(homer, bart).
parent(homer, lisa).
parent(marge, bart).
parent(marge, lisa).
:- end_object.
查询示例可以是:
?- simpsons::parent(homer, Child).
Child = bart ;
Child = lisa.
您可以根据需要创建任意数量的家庭数据库,同时加载它们,并随意定义它们的专业化.例如:
You can them as many family databases as you want, load them at the same time, and define specializations of them at will. For example:
:- object(simpsons_extended,
extends(simpsons)).
male(Male) :-
^^male(Male).
male(abe).
male(herb).
female(Male) :-
^^female(Male).
female(gaby).
female(mona).
parent(Parent, Child) :-
^^parent(Parent, Child).
parent(abe, homer).
parent(abe, herb).
parent(gaby, herb).
parent(mona, homer).
:- end_object.
此解决方案可以满足您的所有要求. SWI-Prolog是受支持的Prolog编译器之一.您可以使用Logtalk的安装程序进行安装.另外,对于SWI-Prolog,您只需输入:
This solution fulfills all your requirements. SWI-Prolog is one of the supported Prolog compilers. You can install Logtalk using on of its installers. Alternatively, for SWI-Prolog, you can simply type:
?- pack_install(logtalk).
更新
在对此解决方案的评论中,您询问了有关将数据库注入到家族树对象逻辑中的问题.这很容易,但是还需要使用其他方法.首先将familytree
定义为:
In your comment to this solution, you asked about injecting a database into the family tree object logic. That's easy but it also requires a different approach. First define familytree
as:
:- object(familytree).
:- public([
father/2, mother/2,
sister/2, brother/2
]).
:- public([
parent/2,
male/1, female/1
]).
:- multifile([
parent/2,
male/1, female/1
]).
father(Father, Child) :-
male(Father),
parent(Father, Child).
mother(Mother, Child) :-
female(Mother),
parent(Mother, Child).
sister(Sister, Child) :-
female(Sister),
parent(Parent, Sister),
parent(Parent, Child),
Sister \== Child.
brother(Brother, Child) :-
male(Brother),
parent(Parent, Brother),
parent(Parent, Child),
Brother \== Child.
:- end_object.
请注意,这是替代方法,我们将male/1
,female/1
和parent/2
称为本地谓词,但它们也被声明为多文件谓词.现在我们需要在familytree
对象中注入"族数据库:
Note that is this alternative, we call male/1
, female/1
, and parent/2
as local predicates but they are also declared as multifile predicates. Now we need to "inject" a family database in the familytree
object:
:- category(simpsons).
:- multifile([
familytree::male/1,
familytree::female/1,
familytree::parent/2
]).
familytree::male(homer).
familytree::male(bart).
familytree::female(marge).
familytree::female(lisa).
familytree::parent(homer, bart).
familytree::parent(homer, lisa).
familytree::parent(homer, maggie).
familytree::parent(marge, bart).
familytree::parent(marge, lisa).
familytree::parent(marge, maggie).
:- end_category.
用法示例(假设familytree.lgt
和simpsons.lgt
文件):
Usage example (assuming familytree.lgt
and simpsons.lgt
files):
?- {familytree, simpsons}.
...
yes
几个示例查询:
?- familytree::parent(homer, Child).
Child = bart ;
Child = lisa ;
Child = maggie.
?- familytree::male(Male).
Male = homer ;
Male = bart.
?- familytree::father(Father, Child).
Father = homer,
Child = bart ;
Father = homer,
Child = lisa ;
Father = homer,
Child = maggie ;
false.
这篇关于Prolog设计模式以扩展模块谓词的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!