问题描述
你曾经有在Web项目的开始WISA或灯之间做出选择？
Did you ever have to choose between WISA or LAMP at the beginning of a web project?
虽然利弊围绕净遍野，这将有助于了解你的真实经验，在未来瓦特/标准，评估，决定，并反映在您决定去瓦特/任何平台。
While pros and cons are littered around the net, it would be helpful to know about your real experience in coming up w/ criteria, evaluating, deciding, and reflecting upon your decision to go w/ either platform.
推荐答案
我觉得第一部分是你的应用程序。如果你决定去PHP，你几乎是自动结束了LAMP，为WIMP或WISP堆栈是相当罕见的（我想blog.stackoverflow.com运行在WIMP），并与.NET你一定要去WISA。
I think the first part is your Application. If you decide to go PHP, you almost automatically end up with LAMP, as WIMP or WISP stacks are quite rare (I think blog.stackoverflow.com runs on WIMP), and with .net you definitely want to go WISA.
所以通常情况下，把它归结为.NET与PHP。 （忽略的Ruby，Python和所有其他的东西了一会儿）。当你作出这一决定，其余的顺其自然，或适应到您的环境（即，如果在公司所有的管理员都是窗户管理员，也许WAMP工作更好地为您）
So normally, it boils down to .net vs. PHP. (Ignoring Ruby, Python and all the other stuff for a moment). When you made that decision, the rest comes naturally or adapts into your environment (i.e. if all your admins in the company are windows admins, maybe WAMP works better for you)
我从PHP转向.NET前一年左右，我从来没有回头看着PHP，但我从来没有看账单Windows和SQL Server的许可证是公平的。对WISA部署由于涉及许可证的更高的初始成本，而LAMP堆栈是免费的（是的，MySQL是还可以免费用于商业用途）。
I switched from PHP to .net about a year ago and I never looked back at PHP, but I never had to look at the bill for Windows and SQL Server licenses to be fair. Deployment on WISA has a much higher initial cost due to the licenses involved, whereas a LAMP Stack is free (Yes, MySQL is also free for commercial use).
附录：结果
所有有趣的缩写代表的技术组合：（L）inux下或（W）INDOWS，（A）帕什或（i）是，（M）ySQL或（S）QL服务器（P）HP或（A） SP.net。
Addendum:
All the funny acronyms stand for the combination of technologies: (L)inux or (W)indows, (A)pache or (I)IS, (M)ySQL or (S)QL Server, (P)hp or (A)SP.net.
这篇关于你怎样决定WISA和LAMP之间？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！