问题描述
请问大家!
我在C#中有一些非常类似的方法(可能会有几十个)。它们都基于几乎相同的模式:
I have a set of a few (and potentially will have dozens more) of very similar methods in C#. They all built on almost identical pattern:
ResultObjectType MethodX(...input parameters of various types...)
{
nesting preparation code here...
{
{
resultObject = ExternalClass.GetResultForMethodX(input parameters of MethodX);
}
}
nesting result processing code here ...
return resultObject;
}
重复/相同的部分: ResultObjectType,准备代码,结果处理代码
Repeating/identical parts: ResultObjectType, preparation code, result processing code.
不同的部分:ExternalClass方法调用,输入参数集(输入参数数量及其类型)。
Different parts: ExternalClass method to call, input parameter set (number of input parameters, their types).
重要提示:我无法控制方法签名 - 无法更改。
我试图避免重复所有类似代码的块,如下所示:
I am trying to avoid repeating all blocks of similar code with something like this:
ResultObjectType MethodX(...input parameters of various types...)
{
return UniversalMethod(
new ExternalMethodDelegate(ExternalClass.GetResultForMethodX),
input parameters of MethodX...);
}
ResultObjectType UniversalMethod (Delegate d, input parameters of various types...)
{
nesting preparation code...
{
{
resultObject =
(d as ExternalMethodDelegate)(same input parameters as above);
}
}
nesting result processing code...
return resultObject;
}
到目前为止,我只是设法使其以这种方式工作,以防万一参数在编码时具有相同的已知类型。经过一番尝试解决这个问题,通用代表我开始认为这是不可能实现的。即使我的代码编译,它在运行时也不起作用。任何人感谢您的帮助!
So far I only managed to make it work in this manner in case where all parameters have the same known type at the time of coding. After a number of attempts to tackle this problem with generic delegates I am starting to think this is not possible to achieve. Even when my code compiles, it does not work at runtime. Any takers? Thanks in advance for your help!
推荐答案
以下是使用泛型代理的示例:
Here's an example using generic delegates:
int MethodY(int something, int other)
{
return UniversalMethod(() => GetResultForMethodY(something, other));
}
string MethodX(string something)
{
return UniversalMethod(() => GetResultForMethodX(something));
}
T UniversalMethod<T>(Func<T> fetcher)
{
T resultObject;
//nesting preparation code here...
{
resultObject = fetcher();
}
//nesting result processing code here ...
return resultObject;
}
如果ResultObjectType始终相同,则可以删除所有 T
s。
If ResultObjectType is always the same then you can remove all T
s.
这篇关于避免重复的代码在多个类似的方法(C#)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!