问题描述
我试图做运算符重载的+ =，但我不能。我只能让一个运算符重载为+。
I am trying to do operator overloads for "+=", but I can't. I can only make an operator overload for "+".
为什么？
修改
这是不工作的原因是，我有一个Vector类（用X和Y字段）。考虑下面的例子。
The reason this is not working is that I have a Vector class (with an X and Y field). Consider the following example.
vector1 += vector2;
如果我的运算符重载设置为：
If my operator overload is set to:
public static Vector operator +(Vector left, Vector right)
{
return new Vector(right.x + left.x, right.y + left.y);
}
那么结果将不会被添加到向量1，而是，向量1将成为一个全新的矢量参考为好。
Then the result won't be added to vector1, but instead, vector1 will become a brand new Vector by reference as well.
推荐答案
重载操作，从MSDN：
赋值运算符不能重载，但 + = ，例如，在使用评估 + ，它可以是超载。
更，没有赋值操作符可以被重载。我认为这是因为将有垃圾收集和内存管理，这是CLR强类型的世界潜在的安全漏洞的影响。
Even more, none of assignment operators can be overloaded. I think this is because there will be an effect for the Garbage collection and memory management, which is a potential security hole in CLR strong typed world.
不过，让我们来看看究竟运营商是。根据著名杰弗里里希特的书，每种编程语言都有自己的运营商名单，这是在一个特殊的方法编译电话，和CLR本身并不知道经营什么。所以，让我们来看看究竟留下的 + 和 + = 运营商。
Nevertheless, let's see what exactly an operator is. According to the famous Jeffrey Richter's book, each programming language has its own operators list, which are compiled in a special method calls, and CLR itself doesn't know anything about operators. So let's see what exactly stays behind the + and += operators.
请参阅这个简单的code：
See this simple code:
Decimal d = 10M;
d = d + 10M;
Console.WriteLine(d);
让查看IL-code这说明：
Let view the IL-code for this instructions:
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldc.i4.s 10
IL_0003: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32)
IL_0008: stloc.0
IL_0009: ldloc.0
IL_000a: ldc.i4.s 10
IL_000c: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32)
IL_0011: call valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal [mscorlib]System.Decimal::op_Addition(valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal,
valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal)
IL_0016: stloc.0
现在让我们看看这个code：
Now lets see this code:
Decimal d1 = 10M;
d1 += 10M;
Console.WriteLine(d1);
和IL-$ C $下这样的：
And IL-code for this:
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldc.i4.s 10
IL_0003: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32)
IL_0008: stloc.0
IL_0009: ldloc.0
IL_000a: ldc.i4.s 10
IL_000c: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32)
IL_0011: call valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal [mscorlib]System.Decimal::op_Addition(valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal,
valuetype [mscorlib]System.Decimal)
IL_0016: stloc.0
他们是平等的！因此， + = 经营者只是语法糖程序的在C＃，然后你可以简单地重载 + 运营商。
They are equal! So the += operator is just syntactic sugar for your program in C#, and you can simply overload + operator.
例如：
class Foo
{
private int c1;
public Foo(int c11)
{
c1 = c11;
}
public static Foo operator +(Foo c1, Foo x)
{
return new Foo(c1.c1 + x.c1);
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Foo d1 = new Foo (10);
Foo d2 = new Foo(11);
d2 += d1;
}
这code会被编译并成功运行为：
This code will be compiled and successfully run as:
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldc.i4.s 10
IL_0003: newobj instance void ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo::.ctor(int32)
IL_0008: stloc.0
IL_0009: ldc.i4.s 11
IL_000b: newobj instance void ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo::.ctor(int32)
IL_0010: stloc.1
IL_0011: ldloc.1
IL_0012: ldloc.0
IL_0013: call class ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo::op_Addition(class ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo,
class ConsoleApplication2.Program/Foo)
IL_0018: stloc.1
更新：
根据您的更新 - 为@EricLippert说，你真的应该有向量作为不可变对象。两个向量的加入结果是一个新载体，不是第一个具有不同的尺寸。
According to your Update - as the @EricLippert says, you really should have the vectors as an immutable object. Result of adding of the two vectors is a new vector, not the first one with different sizes.
如果由于某种原因你需要改变第一个向量，就可以使用此重载（但对我来说，这是非常奇怪的行为）：
If, for some reason you need to change first vector, you can use this overload (but as for me, this is very strange behaviour):
public static Vector operator +(Vector left, Vector right)
{
left.x += right.x;
left.y += right.y;
return left;
}
这篇关于C＃运算符重载的＆QUOT; + =＆QUOT;？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！