问题描述
public class EnumRouteConstraint<T> : IRouteConstraint
where T : struct
{
private static readonly Lazy<HashSet<string>> _enumNames; // <--
static EnumRouteConstraint()
{
if (!typeof(T).IsEnum)
{
throw new ArgumentException(Resources.Error.EnumRouteConstraint.FormatWith(typeof(T).FullName));
}
string[] names = Enum.GetNames(typeof(T));
_enumNames = new Lazy<HashSet<string>>(() => new HashSet<string>
(
names.Select(name => name), StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase
));
}
public bool Match(HttpContextBase httpContext, Route route, string parameterName, RouteValueDictionary values, RouteDirection routeDirection)
{
bool match = _enumNames.Value.Contains(values[parameterName].ToString());
return match;
}
}
这是错的?我会认为这实际上有一个静态只读
字段为每个可能的 EnumRouteConstraint&LT; T&GT;
,我碰巧实例。
Is this wrong? I would assume that this actually has a static readonly
field for each of the possible EnumRouteConstraint<T>
that I happen to instance.
推荐答案
它的优良有一个静态字段泛型类型,只要你知道你会真正得到每个类型参数组合一个字段。我的猜测是,R·只是警告你如果你没有意识到这一点。
It's fine to have a static field in a generic type, so long as you know that you'll really get one field per combination of type arguments. My guess is that R# is just warning you in case you weren't aware of that.
下面是这样一个例子:
using System;
public class Generic<T>
{
// Of course we wouldn't normally have public fields, but...
public static int Foo;
}
public class Test
{
public static void Main()
{
Generic<string>.Foo = 20;
Generic<object>.Foo = 10;
Console.WriteLine(Generic<string>.Foo); // 20
}
}
正如你所看到的,通用&LT;串&GT;包含.foo
是从不同的领域通用&LT;对象&gt;包含.foo
- 他们持有不同的价值观
As you can see, Generic<string>.Foo
is a different field from Generic<object>.Foo
- they hold separate values.
这篇关于ReSharper的警告说:&QUOT;在泛型类型和QUOT静态字段;的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!