问题描述
我一直在搜索（几乎没有成功）asp.net的免费/开源会话群集和复制解决方案。我遇到了通常的可疑对象（indexus sharedcache，memcached），但是每个都有一些局限性。
I've been searching (with little success) for a free/opensource session clustering and replication solution for asp.net. I've run across the usual suspects (indexus sharedcache, memcached), however, each has some limitations.
- Indexus -非常不成熟的存根会话接口实现。
- Memcached -很少的复制/故障转移支持，而无需使用数据库后端。
几个SF.Net项目-所有项目都在早期阶段中止了……似乎没有任何吸引力，似乎没有任何商业价值。 - Microsoft Velocity -不是OSS，但看起来不错。不幸的是，我没有看到CTP1在哪里支持故障转移，也没有明确的路线图。我担心这个项目可能会像许多其他MS开发项目一样掉入以太坊。
- Indexus - Very immature, stubbed session interface implementation. Its otherwise a great caching solution, though.
- Memcached - Little replication/failover support without going to a db backend.Several SF.Net projects - All aborted in the early stages... nothing that appears to have any traction, and one which seems to have gone all commercial.
- Microsoft Velocity - Not OSS, but seems nice. Unfortunately, I didn't see where CTP1 supported failover, and there is no clear roadmap for this one. I fear that this one could fall off into the ether like many other MS dev projects.
我相当习惯Java世界，那里可以从FOSS世界中找到许多诸如此类的解决方案，这是理所当然的。
I am fairly used to the Java world where it is kind of taken for granted that many solutions to problems such as this will be available from the FOSS world.
.Net世界上是否有合适的替代方案？
Are there any suitable alternatives available on the .Net world?
推荐答案
BTW Windows Server AppFabric已超出Beta版。这就是我在上一篇文章中提到的。
BTW Windows Server AppFabric is out of beta. That's what i mentioned in my previous post.
这是一般可用性的链接；-
here is the link on general availability;- http://blogs.technet.com/b/appfabric/archive/2010/06/07/windows-server-appfabric-now-generally-available.aspx
您认为哪些特定功能可以在NCache而不是AppFabric上获得？
which specific features do you think one can get on NCache and not on AppFabric?
这篇关于FOSS ASP.Net会话复制解决方案？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！